Jump to content

Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Shortcut
Deutsche Benutzeroberfläche
Diese Projektseite in anderen Sprachen:
Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten

Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.

Springe zu den aktuellen Kandidaten Springe zu:

Formalien

[edit]

Nominierung

[edit]

Leitsätze für die Nominierung

[edit]

Bitte lies alle Leitsätze vor der Nominierung.

Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:

  • Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
  • Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
  • Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
  • Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
  • Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
  • Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
  • Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
    • nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
    • Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
    • schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.

Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.

  • Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
  • Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
  • Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
  • Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.

Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.

  • Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
  • Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
  • Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
  • Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
  • Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
  • Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
  • Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
  • Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.

Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.

Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen

[edit]

Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.

Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.


Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.

Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein: Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}

Abstimmung

[edit]

Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:

  • {{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
  • {{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
  • {{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)

Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.

Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.

Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.

Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen

[edit]

Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit

  • {{Keep}}  Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
  • {{Delist}}  Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).

Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:


In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:

  • Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
  • Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
  • Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.

Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.

Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten

[edit]

Allgemeine Regeln

[edit]
  1. Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
  2. Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  3. Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
  4. Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
  5. Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
  6. Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
    oder durch Hinzufügen von {{withdraw}} ~~~~.
  7. Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
  8. Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
    1. Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
    2. Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
  9. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
  10. Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
  11. Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.

Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl

[edit]

Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:

  1. Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
  2. Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
  3. Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
  4. Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.

Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.

Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.

Vor allem sei freundlich

[edit]

Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.

Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.

Siehe auch

[edit]


Inhaltsübersicht

[edit]

Exzellenz-Kandidaten

[edit]
Seite erneut laden für neue Nominierungen: purge this page's cache
Shortcut
[edit]

File:LL25 MiTina turning into Norra Grundsund harbor.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 21:46:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shrimp and crayfish boat LL-25 MiTina turning into her home harbor in Norra Grundsund, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.
Standing on the jetty taking photos, I noticed the boat was approaching the harbor a bit faster than I thought it might, also taking the turn into the harbor a bit sharper than it should throwing up a good bow wave and backwash. After it had moored I jokingly commented on this to the captain. He said that he saw me on the jetty with my camera and was showing off to give me a good photo. :) After editing the photo, I sent a copy of it to the boat's internet page and gave them the rights to use it as they pleased. I figured, "one good turn deserves another". They still use this photo on social media and other things. :) All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhavani West Nilgiris Tamil Nadu Nov24 A7CR 05228.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 12:59:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dhavani village, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India

File:Surface of a hedge, Amherstburg, Ontario, 2025-06-03.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 12:41:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Surface of a hedge, Amherstburg, Ontario

File:Christ Church, Amherstburg, Ontario, 2025-06-03 05.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 12:22:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christ Church, Amherstburg, Ontario

File:Brooklyn Historical Society NY2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 01:11:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Terra cotta sculpture at the entrance to the Brooklyn Historical Society building, New York City

File:Borracho mono (Ophioblennius steindachneri), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, México, 2024-12-18, DD 80.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 19:33:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Large-banded blenny (Ophioblennius steindachneri), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico

File:Cascade du Sartre (3).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 15:43:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cascade du Sartre in Cheylade, Cantal, France

File:Cascade de la Roche (15).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 15:41:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cascade de la Roche in Cheylade, Cantal, France

Martioda relics

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 19:16:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • VL-4 skull
    VL-4 skull
  • VSD-2 skull
    VSD-2 skull
  • VL-3 skull
    VL-3 skull
  • VSD-1 skull
    VSD-1 skull
  • VL-6 skull
    VL-6 skull
  • VSI-1 skull
    VSI-1 skull
  • VL-5 skull
    VL-5 skull
  • VL-7 skull
    VL-7 skull
  • VL-1 skull
    VL-1 skull
  • VL-8 skull
    VL-8 skull
  • VL-2 skull
    VL-2 skull
  • VST-2 skull
    VST-2 skull
  • CH1 bones
    CH1 bones
  • CH2 bones
    CH2 bones
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
  •  Info created by Gert Voor in't Holt, Museo de Bellas Artes de Álava – uploaded by User:Theklan – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Theklan (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I think these are very interesting, but having opened the first two and looked at them in full size, there are quite a lot of JPEG artefacts, particularly in the darker areas of the picture Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Cmao20, those artifacts can be fairly easily removed using this program, assuming you have reasonably up-to-date hardware (I don't). The images are too large for my usual methods. JayCubby (talk) 22:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I don't believe that this is a valid set either, there are a bunch of these relics but here we see "only" 14. Apart from the quality I see very similar items without any explanation what do they have in common. A skull and bones belonging to it could be a set, but with no explanation and this quality I cannot support 14 FPs Poco a poco (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I agree with Poco here. The information on each file is the bare minimum, even after I added the basics to each file. If there is an article about the items, it's best to link to it in the file description on each page, posting it here serves no purpose since this page will be archived in a week and in effect hidden from public view. The images are not so different from each other or eye-catching that a set is needed, complete or incomplete. It would be better to pick the best skull of the best photo quality, or skull and bones, to represent the group. --Cart (talk) 11:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pursuit by Mongol Warriors (Diez Albums).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 13:01:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pursuing Mongol warriors, 14th-century

File:Instrument Case with Shuttered Mirror by Muhammad Baqir, Khalili Collection of Islamic Art, laq-0011-front.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 08:07:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lacquered instrument case, Isfahan, 1772 AD

File:NohKaLikai Falls V2 Wiki.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 07:39:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nohkalikai Falls in the Indian state of Meghalaya, before monsoon.

File:Top Chin Cactus Ooty Jun25 A7CR 05768-856 zsp.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 05:10:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Top view of Gymnocalycium mihanovichii

File:Amberboom (Liquidambar styraciflua) 14-04-2025 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 04:57:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Cedar Grove Christian Church Dott PA1.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 01:00:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cedar Grove Christian Church, Dott, Pennsylvania

File:Topknot Pigeon 0A2A6700.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2025 at 00:37:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Topknot pigeon

File:Emmett Till's funeral - mourners (restored).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 23:20:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mamie Till at Emmett Till's funeral
  • @JayCubby - I did remove my vote as I ponder this a bit more. I experimented with cropping the photo and found it to be much more evocative, though found it difficult to get it "just right". I tried the crop on the left to just enough to remove nearest gentleman's face, leaving the full expression of the other man; and, a crop from the right to remove the sliver of the person next to the woman with her arm raised. But, per Cart, I'm wary of advocating for that change. - ERcheck (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Been thinking about this for a long time now, and it is a very moving photo of very good quality taken at what must have been a rather chaotic event. It's a document of an historic event that I think should be preserved and featured in its entirety, after that people can use it as a base for other crops. Sure, we featured Heroico instead of the original, but that was mostly because the cropped version is the best one known and mostly used. I don't see any similar precedence with this. --Cart (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment - The above version is itself cropped. On EmmettTillExhibit.org, which was created in partnership with the Till family, The Emmett Till & Mamie Till-Mobley Institute, the Emmett Till Interpretive Center, and The Children's Museum of Indianapolis, see Image 16. In that "original" photo, Till's grandfather is also in the photo. As such, if one accepts a crop from the right, accepting a crop from the left (which is actually not taking out key people), would seem acceptable. - ERcheck (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Now the problem with that is that the full photo, probably from the original negative, is apparently owned some foundation or museum, so we are not sure that one is free to use and can probably not get our hands on it. The cropped photo above on the other hand, is from a paper copy owned by the Smithsonian and we know it is free. This is why so few old iconic photos get promoted. There are often many versions of them floating around and people here are forever quarrelling about which version to promote. (I can't remember how many attempts were made for different versions of Heroico for years.) I still say I vote to promote the whole photo we have and know is free, and let other crops be made from it, instead of mucking things up further. --Cart (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I full-heartedly agree with Cart here! Kritzolina (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mero chino (Cirrhitus rivulatus), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, México, 2024-12-18, DD 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 20:45:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Giant hawkfish (Cirrhitus rivulatus), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico

File:GG 844 Björholmen May 2025 02.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 19:18:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fishing vessel GG844 Idunn

File:Caretos Lazarim, Portugal.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 19:00:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Masked carnival participant from Portugal

File:Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris fuscoater) black variant Meidling 2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 15:14:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris fuscoater) black variant
  • Charlesjsharp, just a general point, because I don't think the official rules on categories are all that clear and I have struggled with them in the past too - Cart and Aristeas did a great explanation of categories here. In short, ask yourself questions based on Kipling's honest serving men. In the example of this nomination, I see that you had the 'what' and 'where' covered, though you could have been more specific with the 'where', but you missed the 'when' (Cart has now covered that with adding 'Nature of Vienna in August') and you also had an opportunity to categorise based on the animal's specific behaviour (eating hazelnuts), i.e. not just 'what is it' but 'what is it doing'. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • "if he doesn't do it, why should I do it..."
"if he doesn't do it, then I shall do this..."
Dear Lord, it sounds like we are dealing with a bunch of six year old boys here!
A.Savin, while I understand your frustration, keeping an 'oppose' on such grounds is just petty and it won't change Charles' behavior one bit. Let me offer an alternative solution. If Charles, despite being a veteran nominator here and being told and corrected over and over again, still doesn't fulfill the basics of presenting a complete file in the noms, that can be seen as negligence, disrupting the workflow here and causing undue friction on the site. Constantly relying on others to do the work for you and pointing fingers instead, could be grounds for a block. As we know, blocks aren't punitive, but if we are looking at a future where FPC voters repeatedly have to save Charles from himself, that is bleak indeed. It is dangerously close to what got ArionStar blocked from this site. 'Pinging' Cmao20 too, as they are part of the discussion. --Cart (talk) 11:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) Meidling.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 15:19:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

European hamster (Cricetus cricetus)

File:Dunes, Désert du Thar.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 14:54:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sand dune with dune ripples in Thar Desert of India.

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Lamproptera curius (Fabricius, 1787) - White Dragontail (49435).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 14:46:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing mud-puddling position of Lamproptera curius (Fabricius, 1787) - White Dragontail.
Ok Atudu, of course I can help with this. However, since you are only the nominator and MaheshBaruahwildlife is the author and I don't have their permission to overwrite, this will be a separate file and offered as an 'Alternative' on this nomination, unless I get MaheshBaruahwildlife's permission to fix this. I'll wait a while to upload it to see what you two would like me to do. --Cart (talk) 05:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you can 2402:3A80:1C71:1334:C075:DFF:FEA5:ACB5 08:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes You can. MaheshBaruahwildlife (talk) 08:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your quick answer. ✓ Done :) --Cart (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your effort. Atudu (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tide ice formations in Brofjorden at Sandvik 5.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 12:22:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tide ice formations, or ice flowers, created by the tide around rocks near the shore in Brofjorden, Brastad, Sweden.

File:Amurtiger-Zoo-Duisburg-Bad-Wasserlinsen-2025-2.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 11:38:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Siberian tiger in Duisburg Zoo taking a bath in a pond convered with Lemna

File:Burst of Joy.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 17:37:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

1974 Pulitzer Prize for feature photograph

File:Freilichtmuseum Beuren - Backhaus aus Sulzgries - Ansicht von Westen - Einheizen.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 08:22:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old bake house from Sulzgries, Esslingen am Neckar, in the Beuren open-air museum

File:Trier, 08-12-2023 (actm.) 38.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 04:56:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:White Throated Kingfisher with catch.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 04:57:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White Throated Kingfisher
  •  Comment I may risk being uncharitable here but I struggle to understand how this picture, which is almost completely lacking in detail at full size, gets rave reviews from you whereas my nomination gets an oppose vote for 'lack of detail'. Cmao20 (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Kingfishers are great subjects. Acroterion (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The comments below are valid criticisms, thank you for highlighting them. They should also be curable to enhance the image to FP expectations both technically and aesthetically. ROCKY, is it possible to induce the uploader to upload a less-aggressively-processed version? They appear to have been active in March. Acroterion (talk) 17:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose A beautiful and difficult shot, regrettably ruined by excessive sharpening and noise reduction --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose Sadly, I have to agree with Julesvernex2. It's unfortunate that excessive sharpening and denoising have resulted in a washed-out and overly uniform look – many details appear lost. With more careful post-processing, especially when using AI-based tools, significantly better results are possible. Perhaps the nominator could kindly ask the author via e-mail whether a new development from the Raw file might be feasible? Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose per Jules and Radomianin, so sorry. It always makes me sad when I see that people have great skills and make every effort to achieve wonderful photos, but then damage these images by rash post-processing so that they look like smartphone shots. This is such a stunning photo, it has deserved much better post-processing. Nerd hint: the pattern in some of the OOF drops of water at the top may be caused by the Phase Fresnel (PF) lens element; this is an additional reason why this photo needs careful editing – one should not emphasize that pattern by sharpening.– Aristeas (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah, good point! This review warns about the risk of getting "Fresnel bokeh" on specular highlights, indeed one more reason to be careful when editing this image Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Julesvernex2 is right, great capture but very poor quality and overprocessed at full size Cmao20 (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2025 at 19:11:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nautilus Shell, 1927, by Edward Weston
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Nautilidae
[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2025 at 18:23:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Meadowsweet with both buds and blooms, by Lysekil Line in Brastad, Sweden.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Rosales#Family : Rosaceae

File:Brown Rat (Rattus norvegicus) also called Norway Rat or Common Rat -with food container - Mathias Baldwin Park, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.jpg, featured

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2025 at 15:28:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) examines food waste left behind in a Philadelphia park.
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Muridae_(Murids)

File:Head of Franz Kafka - kinetic sculpture 06.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2025 at 05:50:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close-up of the kinetic sculpture "Head of Franz Kafka" in motion. One can see the different bright metal planes of the sculpture reflecting scenery in front of the slightly blurred background of an office building

File:Iarnród Éireann 2603 Glounthaune - Fota.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2025 at 12:20:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Iarnród Éireann 2603 between Glounthaune and Fota, Ireland
  • The writing on the two cars, the stone ballast in front of the train are not clear. The trees appear as smudges. Given the 23 MP res and 1/1600 shutter, I expect better better detail. Perhaps the camera was set to medium or low jpg quality? Or while saving in post-processing? An FP should be printable at the highest res without need for downsampling. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I strongly disagree with the idea that an FP should be printable at the highest res without need for downsampling. Ultimately this is just punishing creators for uploading high resolution files. A 23 megapixel image that is slightly blurry at full size but sharp when downsampled to 10 megapixels is superior to a completely sharp 10 megapixel image in every way. Anyway, I take your criticisms, but we've recently promoted far less sharp images than this. Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Papilio helenus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Red Helen.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2025 at 15:17:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Close wing mud-puddling position of Papilio helenus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Red Helen.

File:US Army soldier welding two metal pieces, Fort Gregg-Adams, Virginia, March 2025.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2025 at 00:44:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

US Army soldier welds two metal pieces together during training at Cohen Hall, Fort Gregg-Adams, Virginia, USA on March 13, 2025.

File:Damian-Skulptur-Domschatz-Essen.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2025 at 18:40:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This sculpture shows Saint Damian, one of the twin brothers Cosmas and Damian, located at the entrance of the Essen Cathedral Treasury. The figure is made of wood, gilded and silvered. It dates from 1715 and was donated by Princess Bernhardine of Hesse-Rheinfels.

File:Vaasa-Kvarken-Watchtover.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2025 at 10:33:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A view of the Finnish Kvarken Archipelago in the Gulf of Bothnia. Picutre is taken inside from an observation tower in Raippaluoto, Vaasa.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Finland
  •  Info created by Osmo Lundell – uploaded by Osmo Lundell – nominated by Osmo Lundell -- --Osmo Lundell hey 10:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- --Osmo Lundell hey 10:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Hi Osmo, and welcome to FPC. This is a very beautiful view, and I would love to see a photo of this archipelago as FP. Unfortunately an iPhone can almost never provide enough detail and image quality for this, especially for such panoramic photos. The best way to get acquainted with what quality is good enough is to first nominate your photos at COM:QIC. That way you are guided into the process in a more gentle way and get feedback for your photos. Best, --Cart (talk) 16:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey! Thank you for your kind response. Is the quality an actual issue here? The quality is very good and in the same level as any other photos of panoramic views (in my opinion of course). I think that you might have gotten this idea from your personal opinion of photography with phones? Or is it general consensus-driven "rule of thumb" that pictures can't be featured if they have been taken with a phone? Sorry I'm not trying to be an AH, I'm genuinely confused. --Osmo Lundell hey 00:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    All images are evaluated at 100% magnification. The standards for quality for FPs is very high, it's only lately that some phones aided by good editing programs have been able to compete here. Take a look at some of the other nominations here with a lot of support. Open them up full and you'll see the difference. Also see my comment below about images from phones. It's usually something of a shock for people who are used to phone photos, how much more image quality is required here. This is because FPs are expected to hold quality enough to have partial images extracted from it if necessary, or to be printed in large format. Also none of us here go by just our own experiences with phone photos. Many of us have been reviewing photos here for years, thousands of photos each year, so we have seen all sorts of photos from all sorts of cameras. Sometimes a photo from a cheap compact camera can outshine a photo taken by an insanely expensive Hasselblad or a shot that NASA spent millions to get. It all depends on how good a photographer and editor you are. --Cart (talk) 01:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sadly I would not say the quality is 'very good'. It is good for a phone camera but I fear this will not cut it at FPC. The detail at full size is not really there - zoom in to pixel level size and look how little sharpness and definition there is on anything - compare to the nominations on this page right now that have a lot of support and the difference is clear. Nevertheless I think the motif is great and I really like the composition. But I don't think it can be FP. Cmao20 (talk) 02:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Osmo dont let to kill mans ambition for photo. I think smartphones are good enough today to made more than good shot. We already have many FP, even from cheaper phones. With some edit, and horizon is rotated. I would go normal "non-binned" 12 Mpx. --Mile (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Mile, I know you mean well and hopefully you won't take this the wrong way, but sometimes your English is a little hard to understand. Can you please explain the first and last sentences in your post here, I don't understand what you are saying and I really want to since you know so much about photography. I'm always ready to listen to your advice. --Cart (talk) 18:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cart, phones can provide good quality and FP can be made with them, but often edition is needed. Don't we have Category "Made with Smartphone" yet ? We should if it doesnt exist. --Mile (talk) 20:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I know that it has happened in some cases (like this or this where not much detail is needed, both made in good light, while this nom is trying a very-hard-to-do light situation), but it's still much harder to get the detail and sharpness needed for FPs with a phone, and like you say some editing is usually needed. We don't rank FPs by the camera they were made with, that is beside the point, only the end-result matters. Some motifs are easier to capture well with a phone, and panoramas are among the hardest. I don't dismiss phone photos in general, I always examine them carefully and sometimes I'm surprised by how good they are, but this one is too blotchy for me. It looks like there is a strong wind, and all that motion makes it even harder for the phone to perform well. Take a look at these two images, both taken by me with the same phone, both edited as well as I could with the same Photoshop version, and notice the difference between the windy one and the one taken on a calm day. I could almost be thinking about nominating the "calm" photo, but people here would think I was nuts if I tried the "windy" one. --Cart (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The concept of the image is nice, and the composition through the aperture of the tower is cool. But when viewed at full resolution, the pixels are blotchy. The image isn't sharp, especially the grasses, but even the wood of the tower. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think my color correction export might have f'd the result. I'm willing to just up the RAW file, but Commons doesn't support it I guess? Thanks for your comment and for kind words too! --Osmo Lundell hey 00:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It absolutely is possible to get FPs from smartphones, (this picture I took, for example), but this image really lacks the required sharpness. Also, my picture was taken on the iPhone's RawMAX settings, which produces large raw images with more detail captured than with usual that can be edited in post-proccessing. It might be worth trying if available.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No one is saying it isn't possible to get FPs from phones, we have several examples of that (about 0.08% of all FPs are) , just that it's much harder than with larger sensor cameras. --Cart (talk) 14:57, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I know that, Cart, of course. I was responding to Osmo Lundell and others who may be under the impression that the oppose votes are due to it being a phone picture. The quality just isn't there in this image. There's also perspective issues I think. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey, I also think it’s not the sharpest out there definetly, but the quality smd sharpness of the individual birch leaves is not the point of the image, and the quality/sharpness is in align with other panoramif photos, for example the ones Cart gave as an example above. Additionally I responded directly to Carts comment, because indeed it was his opinion which I mistook for a general guideline. But the consensus seems clear already and I respect the community and this conversation as always. I’ll return with a different nomination soon! --Osmo Lundell hey 21:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC) quick typo fix! --Osmo Lundell hey 21:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The photos I linked to was not examples of what quality we expect from FPs, far from it! They were only meant to illustrate how wind can affect a phone photos quality, not something I would consider nominate here. Also we all express our individual view on photos, unless a guideline is explicitly quoted.
    You can wait this nom out, or if you wish, you can withdraw it by posting the {{Withdraw}} tag on it. Looking forward to other photos. I'm always happy to see work by other Nordic photographers as there aren't many of us here on FPC. ;) --Cart (talk) 23:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll wait this nom out, the conversation might still keep rolling! PS. Du har rätt, Nordics unite! Fattade kopplingen först när jag slängde ett öga på din användarsida, kul! Kanske ses vi på nästa års Mello eller på nån wikimeetup om du dyker upp där! Också min point var att precis som i de där panoramorna, är hela bildens kontext det viktiga här, inte själva zoomandet. But enough of that :D --Osmo Lundell hey 12:06, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support In my opinion, the composition is the whole point of the photo, you would not crop this photo and it looks good enough at full size  REAL 💬 ⬆   00:05, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama of Sion, Switzerland from the north-west, with Tourbillon Castle and Valère Basilica (2022).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2025 at 13:28:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panorama of Sion, Switzerland from the north-west, showing Tourbillon Castle (left), the Valère Basilica (right) and parts of the old town.

Alternative version

[edit]

Panorama of Sion, Switzerland from the north-west, showing Tourbillon Castle (left), the Valère Basilica (right) and parts of the old town.


Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)

[edit]
Sun 01 Jun → Fri 06 Jun
Mon 02 Jun → Sat 07 Jun
Tue 03 Jun → Sun 08 Jun
Wed 04 Jun → Mon 09 Jun
Thu 05 Jun → Tue 10 Jun
Fri 06 Jun → Wed 11 Jun

Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)

[edit]
Tue 27 May → Fri 06 Jun
Wed 28 May → Sat 07 Jun
Thu 29 May → Sun 08 Jun
Fri 30 May → Mon 09 Jun
Sat 31 May → Tue 10 Jun
Sun 01 Jun → Wed 11 Jun
Mon 02 Jun → Thu 12 Jun
Tue 03 Jun → Fri 13 Jun
Wed 04 Jun → Sat 14 Jun
Thu 05 Jun → Sun 15 Jun
Fri 06 Jun → Mon 16 Jun
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Kandidaten_für_exzellente_Bilder&oldid=978969898"