Commons:Quality images candidates

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose
[edit]The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines
[edit]All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators
[edit]Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements
[edit]- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator
[edit]- Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements
[edit]More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution
[edit]Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality
[edit]Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting
[edit]The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value
[edit]Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate
[edit]Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations
[edit]No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images
[edit]When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review
[edit]Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion
[edit]If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision
[edit]QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 2025.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 2025.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)
[edit]Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 06 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process
[edit]Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review
[edit]To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules
[edit]See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations
[edit]Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 04:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).
|
---|
June 6, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State Gatehouse. Back of the gatehouse with flight holes for pigeons. They were kept for fertilizing the garden and for consumption.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 6 June 2025 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Rauwerd (Fries Raerd). Jongema State Gatehouse. Back of the gatehouse with flight holes for pigeons. They were kept for fertilizing the garden and for consumption.
-
- Nomination: Meadow in the middle of "Urlesbachtal" nature reserve near Humprechtshausen --Plozessor 03:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View from the Kirchberg south of Schönbach (Ebelsbach) towards Breitbrunn --Plozessor 03:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Western edge of "Alster ground with border stripe" nature reserve in Thuringia --Plozessor 03:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Meadow in "Schulterbach valley" nature reserve --Plozessor 03:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Detail of the wayside shrine north of St. Anne chapel east of Stettfeld --Plozessor 03:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lahic, Ismailli Rayon, Azerbaijan --Bgag 02:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Badoyun Mosque, Lahic, Ismailli Rayon, Azerbaijan --Bgag 02:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Badoyun Mosque, Lahic, Ismailli Rayon, Azerbaijan --Bgag 02:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Manhole cover at the corner of Isanova and Tashkentskaya streets. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 02:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sunset at the Aidarkul lake. Arnasai ornitological reserve, Forish District, Jizzakh region, Uzbekistan. By User:Галиев Ярослав --Красный 02:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination View at tha Karatutbashi mountain from the Brichmullah village. Ugom-Chatkal national park, Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Галиев Ярослав --Красный 02:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Soviet plate "A house of exemplary maintenance and high culture of life" at 72, Tabyshaliyev street, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. By User:ElenaLitera --Красный 02:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Belfry of church of Protection at Prolom, Pskov, Russia. By User:Елена Нечипоренко --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:10, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aganippe statue in the middle of Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of lion at the bottom of Big Stone Staircase, Pavlovsk, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Manhole cover in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Manhole cover in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madam Marie's Temple of Knowledge on the boardwalk at Asbury Park, New Jersey --Acroterion 01:52, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:59, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
June 5, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: One of the valleys of Ala Archa National Park, photographed from the bottom, Chuy Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:SimPilotAdamT --Екатерина Борисова 22:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Hills in Ala-Archa National Park, Chuy Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Artelow --Екатерина Борисова 22:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rocks in Ala-Archa National Park, Chuy Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Artelow --Екатерина Борисова 22:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kan-i-Gut cave, Batken Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Nefesh03 --Екатерина Борисова 22:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kan-i-Gut cave, Batken Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Nefesh03 --Екатерина Борисова 22:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Common Blues in the nature reserve Mallertshofer Holz mit Heiden --FlocciNivis 21:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Overexposed and not sharp, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View up at the water tower in Neu-Ulm --FlocciNivis 21:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The pipe organ the church St. Bartholomäus in Nuremberg-Wöhrd --FlocciNivis 21:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The Bayerische Staatskanzlei in Winter with snow --FlocciNivis 21:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The chapel St. Maria in Plattling --FlocciNivis 21:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ringed kingfisher (Megaceryle torquata) male in flight --Charlesjsharp 21:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Ringed kingfisher (Megaceryle torquata) male in flight --Charlesjsharp 21:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja) young adult --Charlesjsharp 21:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:53, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Red-throated caracara (Ibycter americanus) --Charlesjsharp 21:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
CA at the left side of the bird and under the limb --Plozessor 03:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rufous-bellied euphonia (Euphonia rufiventris) female --Charlesjsharp 21:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Lada Kalina. Bogobod street, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. --Jamshid Nurkulov 20:26, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The Rheingrafenstein with Rheingrafenstein Castle seen from the north --Milseburg 20:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Opel Kadett. Muqimiy street, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. --Jamshid Nurkulov 19:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Black alder twig, old wood and water ripples at Wolfsberger Mühle, Germany --Radomianin 19:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building of Wolfsberger Mühle near Tessin, Germany --Radomianin 19:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferrari LaFerrari (2013) --Auge=mit 18:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 18:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Blurry --Plozessor 03:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature’s EleganceI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --A S M Jobaer 17:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Bad categorization, file name and descriptions need to be improved --Kritzolina 18:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nature’s EleganceI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --A S M Jobaer 17:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Bad categorization, file name and descriptions need to be improved --Kritzolina 18:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eyes of the WildI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --A S M Jobaer 17:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality, much too dark, bad categroization, file name and descriptions need to be improved --Kritzolina 18:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A light in the darkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --A S M Jobaer 17:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Bad categorization, file name and description need to be improved --Kritzolina 18:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chasing DreamsI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --A S M Jobaer 17:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Overcat, file name and description need to be improved --Kritzolina 18:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of Nové Hrady (South Bohemian Region) from the west. --Suisant7 17:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mesa del Mar, Tenerife --Mike Peel 16:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Volcan de Teno and Ragnarok at the Port of Los Cristianos behind Playa Honda, Tenerife --Mike Peel 16:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ragnarok departing from the port of Los Cristianos, Tenerife --Mike Peel 16:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Playa Honda, Los Cristianos, Tenerife --Mike Peel 16:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kohlmarkt Street in Vienna --Perituss 16:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bentley Continental GTC (4th gen.) at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 16:17, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dodge Durango SRT Hellcat at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 16:17, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: BMW M5 (G90) at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 16:17, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Italy, Noto, Via Corrado Nicolaci --Berthold Werner 16:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bentley Continental GTC (4th gen.) at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 15:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-AMG S214 53 Hybrid at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 15:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Italy, Noto, Balcony at the Palazzo Astuto di Fargione --Berthold Werner 15:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 1st Tverskaya-Yamskaya Street in Moscow --Perituss 15:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 1982 Toyota Corona 1800GT-TR --TTTNIS 14:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 2015 Nissan Dayz Highway Star X --TTTNIS 14:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2015 Nissan Dayz Highway Star X --TTTNIS 14:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2009 Suzuki Carry Truck --TTTNIS 14:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Rear view of 2009 Suzuki Carry Truck --TTTNIS 14:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lakeside of Viverone (BI), Italy, from the right side --Esniom 14:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 1 --Jacek Halicki 14:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Radomianin 19:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 2 --Jacek Halicki 14:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Radomianin 19:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roadside chapel in Suszyna 1 --Jacek Halicki 14:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roadside chapel in Suszyna 2 --Jacek Halicki 14:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roadside chapel in Suszyna 3 --Jacek Halicki 14:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Radomianin 19:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asphalt road in the extinct village of Kunšach --Suisant7 12:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp, sorry --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Foret domaniale de la Roquette-Bonneval in Curieres, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baptismal font in the Saint Bartholomew church in Villecomtal, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Paul church in Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Priory of Comberoumal in commune of Saint-Beauzély, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Historic center of San Felice Circeo (LT), Italy --Esniom 12:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Crucifix in the extinct village of Kunšach --Suisant7 11:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Closed wing of Pieris canidia (Linnaeus, 1768) - Asian Cabbage White (by Rijuroy89) --Sandipoutsider 11:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Close wing Nectaring of Delias eucharis (Drury, 1773) - Indian Jezebel (Male) --Sandipoutsider 11:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Close wing posture Nectaring of Anthene lycaenina (R. Felder, 1868) - Pointed Ciliate Blue --Sandipoutsider 11:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Close wing Nectaring of Delias eucharis (Drury, 1773) - Indian Jezebel (Male) --Sandipoutsider 11:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 18:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing Nectaring of Leptosia nina (Fabricius, 1793) - Psyche --Sandipoutsider 11:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --Esniom 15:31, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coprinopsis cinerea in Karagach grove. Sverdlov district, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 10:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The foreground area of the mushroom is out of focus and blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 10:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at the corner of Ryskulov and Turusbekov streets. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 10:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jamshid Nurkulov 12:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Dog sleeping on the grass. Ugom-Chatkal national park, Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Галиев Ярослав --Красный 10:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asian Woolly-necked Stork in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asian Woolly-necked Stork in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asian Woolly-necked Stork in Jawai Bandh, Rajasthan, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asian Woolly-necked Stork in Jawai Bandh, Rajasthan, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Right side of Viverone lake, Italy --Esniom 08:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted. --Sebring12Hrs 10:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Suisant7 14:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Nyceryx eximia - △ Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 07:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Moscow --Lvova 07:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 07:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Moscow --Lvova 07:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 07:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Moscow --Lvova 07:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 07:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Paeonia lactiflora --Lvova 07:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Schizanthus --Lvova 07:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Nyceryx furtadoi - Dorsal side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 07:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Nyceryx furtadoi - △ Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 07:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Neogurelca hyas - Dorsal side- Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 07:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Neogurelca hyas - △ Ventral side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 07:29, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 08:26, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View on the Ferme de Meurchin, in Sailly-lez-Lannoy, France --Velvet 07:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Vasco da Gama bridge at sunset with the November 2016 supermoon in the background, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 06:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 5 --Jacek Halicki 06:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 07:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jetty and Sauna building in Björholmen, Sweden. --ArildV 06:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Björholmen, Tjörn --ArildV 06:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frihamnskyrkan is a church in Göteborg, Sweden. --ArildV 06:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barn in the villages Halsbäck in Tjörn, Sweden. --ArildV 06:27, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Perspective view of Garbhagriha with Galigopura of Sri Chandrasekhara Temple --I.Mahesh 06:26, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Perspective view of Garbhagriha with Galigopura of Sri Chandrasekhara Temple --I.Mahesh 06:26, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Perspective view of Garbhagriha with Galigopura of Sri Chandrasekhara Temple --I.Mahesh 06:26, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Statue of Saint Michael on top of a monument --Romainbehar 06:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - Saint Martin basilica - The choir and part of the nave --Benjism89 05:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - Saint Martin basilica - Interior --Benjism89 05:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktstraße 87 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktstraße 48 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktstraße 42 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Galeerenturm in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Katharinenkapelle in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:49, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Supreme Court, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sri Srinivasa Perumal Temple, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gardens by the Bay, Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gardens by the Bay, Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leisure activity at the Edelweiß bath on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leisure activity at the Edelweiß bath on Hauptstraße in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roses and fence in front of the manor house «Lieleg» on Hauptstraße #102 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Venezia, architectural design by Josef Victor Fuchs 1891, on Johannaweg #1, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motorship “Klagenfurt” at the Werzerpromenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Section of the demolished old Buger Bridge in Bamberg --Ermell 05:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Section of the demolished old Buger Bridge in Bamberg --Ermell 05:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Demag AC 100 4L at the Buger Bridge construction site in Bamberg Bug --Ermell 05:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Demag RK600 - 1 at the Buger Bridge construction site in Bamberg Bug --Ermell 05:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Demag RK600 - 1 at the Buger Bridge construction site in Bamberg Bug --Ermell 05:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Belvedere Castle, Central Park 2025 --Boaventuravinicius 04:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Water Fountain in Central Park - May 2025 --Boaventuravinicius 04:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Penn Station's clock (May 2025) --Boaventuravinicius 04:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: New York State Flag, Times Square, May 2025 --Boaventuravinicius 04:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Julianapark (Bolsward). National Monument 512829 EISMA-BANK 1936.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Julianapark (Bolsward). National Monument 512829 EISMA-BANK 1936.
-
- Nomination Dry tree in the northern part of the Zeilberg stone experience trail near Maroldsweisach --Plozessor 03:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Humprechtshausen from the cemetery --Plozessor 03:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reliefs in the Audience Palace (Palace S), Pasargadae, Iran --Bgag 02:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nasir ol Molk Mosque (Pink Mosque), Shiraz, Iran --Bgag 02:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
This has quite low detail (see the tiles in front that you can't make out or the left part of the building), also chroma noise, though it was taken with ISO 100 and a proper camera. Probably it can be improved with better raw conversion? --Plozessor 03:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Done Is it better now? --Bgag 17:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Izadkhvast Castle, Iran --Bgag 02:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
There are vertical stripes in the sky on the left side, and some spots or similar in the sky in the middle. Is this a natural phenomenon? --Plozessor 03:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Info I just realized that the picture was taken from inside a bus through the window. My mistake. --Bgag 17:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses and paved alley, Econy (Akoni) village, Udhagai taluk, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu --Tagooty 02:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nissan NT100 Clipper kei truck in white - renominated after CA fixes --Mr.choppers 01:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Christ Church, Amherstburg, Ontario, 2025-06-01 --Crisco 1492 00:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Dancing Bear" by Pauta Saila, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-31 --Crisco 1492 00:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Bell Measure" by Stephen Cruise, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-31 --Crisco 1492 00:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good picture. As with the other one, you have duplicate "self" templates in the description, and I'd recommend using "Art photo" instead of "Information". --Plozessor 03:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Eve's Apple" by Edwina Sandys, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-31 --Crisco 1492 00:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Morning Flight" by Gerald Gladstone, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-31 --Crisco 1492 00:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Picture is good. I would recommend using the "Art photo" template instead of "Description", so that you can clearly distinct the photographer from the creator of the artwork. --Plozessor 03:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
June 4, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Building in Moscow --Perituss 00:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rothenbuch forest, nature reserve WDPA 81688 'Metzgergraben-Krone', special protection area 6022-471 'Spessart', special area of conservation 6022-371 'Hochspessart', deadwood --KaiBorgeest 22:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk in Niwa 1 --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Statue of John of Nepomuk in Niwa 2 --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 1 --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 2 --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków 3 --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Noa Hirst Walker during UCI MTB world cup in Loudenvielle 2025 --Shougissime 20:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Großer Feldberg in the Taunus, seen from Großer Mannstein --Milseburg 20:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination VAZ-2104. Bunyodkor avenue, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. --Jamshid Nurkulov 19:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ziv 20:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Leapmotor C10 EV in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kia Telluride in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Vasco da Gama bridge at sunset seen from Parque das Nações, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An HDR-photography of the Opera House in Nuremberg at night --FlocciNivis 17:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Ringlet in the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 17:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp enough. Sorry. --Ermell 07:35, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A construction site at the church St. Georg in Freising --FlocciNivis 17:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A Meadow Brown in the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 17:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination View across the Main to the Friedensbrücke in Würzburg --FlocciNivis 17:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Felix Griffiths during UCI MTB world cup in Loudenvielle 2025 --Shougissime 16:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 18:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Runway of Altiport de Peyresourde-Balestas --Shougissime 16:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opel Frontera C Hybrid at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 15:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jamshid Nurkulov 01:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Audi A6 Avant C9 at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 15:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kia Picanto (JA) at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 15:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination , Cerkiew prawosławna, ob. kościół rzym.-kat. św. Rajmunda, wraz z figurą Matki Boskiej Niepokalanej stojącą przed fasadąIch, der Urheber dieses Werkes, veröffentliche es unter der folgenden Lizenz:Dieses Bild wurde im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 hochgeladen. By User:Grażyna Adamczyk --Ziv 15:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 16:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing Basking posture of Junonia orithya (Linnaeus, 1758) - Blue Pansy --Sandipoutsider 11:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Erinnyis crameri - Dorsal side Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 11:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Erinnyis crameri - Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 11:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 13:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Close wing Basking of Pelopidas agna (Moore, (1866)) - Obscure Branded Swift--Sandipoutsider 10:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Misumena vatia on Gentiana flower. Ugom-Chatkal national park. Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Галиев Ярослав --Красный 10:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Unfortunately, the spider is rather blurry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rock tower at Kasarma location. Saigachiy reserve, Kungrad District, Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan. By User:Dilmurad91 --Красный 10:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at Bishkek-1 railway station. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 10:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 16:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at Manas street near the KNU botanical garden. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 10:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover at the corner of Manas and Kurenkeyev street. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 10:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing Basking posture of Oriens gola (Moore, 1877) - Common Dartlet --Sandipoutsider 09:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Partial open wing Basking of Freyeria putli (Kollar, (1844)) - Black-spotted Grass Jewel --Sandipoutsider 09:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Open wing Basking posture of Tajuria cippus (Fabricius, 1798) - Peacock Royal (Female) --Sandipoutsider 09:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Fine --Pudelek 10:06, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Memento Park, Budapest, Hungary --Pudelek 09:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Jeseník train station, Czech Sileisa --Pudelek 09:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Asian Tit in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Asian Tit in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Asian Tit in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Asian Tit in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asian Tit in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 11:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panoramic view of the municipality of Filettino (FR), Italy --Esniom 09:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good but I find the background a bit too noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 13:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - The circular arcades of Maria Immacolata square --Benjism89 08:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - The circular arcades of Maria Immacolata square, hosting a restaurant --Benjism89 08:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - Saint Martin basilica - The Holy Sacrament chapel --Benjism89 08:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - Saint Martin basilica - The choir --Benjism89 08:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Il y a beaucoup moins de color noise que d'habitude. C'est vraiment beau. --Sebring12Hrs 13:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A manhole cover in Moscow --Lvova 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Moscow --Lvova 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Moscow --Lvova 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paeonia lactiflora --Lvova 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:56, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Viola tricolor --Lvova 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Peranakan Museum, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Fountain of Wealth, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Esplanade Theater, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Central Fire Station, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gardens by the Bay, Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ellora caves waterfall. By User:Vinayaraj --UnpetitproleX 08:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saints Eurosia and John the Baptist church in Cesiomaggiore (BL, Italy) --Syrio 08:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Amanita muscaria, Folgorida (TN, Italy) (previously unassessed) --Syrio 08:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support I'd have cropped or cloned out the top left corner, but still ok --Poco a poco 08:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ochsenanger nature reserve near Ebing --Ermell 07:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Beautiful view, but the upper right trees are blurrt and there's a visible halo along the contour of all the trees (except very left ones) --Екатерина Борисова 02:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Oberköst --Ermell 07:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Oberköst --Ermell 07:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Oberköst --Ermell 07:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 08:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Rue de la Couture, in Sailly-lez-Lannoy, France --Velvet 07:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Eglise Saint-Pierre, in Sailly-lez-Lannoy, France --Velvet 07:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 08:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cautethia grotei - △ Ventral side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 07:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 07:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cautethia grotei - Dorsal side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 07:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Stiftskirche in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 07:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ravelinstraße 3 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westring 16 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 11:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktstraße 52-54 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktstraße 56 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shed in the small village of Halsbäck in Tjörn Municipality --ArildV 06:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hisingsbron (the Hissing bridge) in Göteborg, Sweden. --ArildV 06:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Björshuvudets naturreservat (nature reserve).--ArildV 06:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boathouse in Björholmen, Tjörn.the building is not straight--ArildV 06:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape on Tjörn. --ArildV 06:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The lake called Deininger Weiher in the nature reserve Südliches Gleißental --Kritzolina 06:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality & nice scenery. --Auge=mit 18:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to Jules Anspach : statues and medallion --Romainbehar 05:48, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rain Vortex, Singapore --Mike Peel 05:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rain Vortex, Singapore --Mike Peel 05:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rain Vortex, Singapore --Mike Peel 05:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Rain Vortex, Singapore --Mike Peel 05:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 08:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rain Vortex, Singapore --Mike Peel 05:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Soviet Army graves at the Cemetery Südfriedhof in Halle (Saale). --Romzig 04:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Poppingawier. Reformed Church (Nikolaastsjerke). Binnenbuorren 12.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Poppingawier. Reformed Church (Nikolaastsjerke). Binnenbuorren 12.
-
- Nomination: Inside Ganagitti Sri Jaina Basadi --I.Mahesh 03:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Inside the Garbhagriha of Ganagitti Sri Jaina Basadi --I.Mahesh 03:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Perspective view of Ganagitti Sri Jaina Basadi --I.Mahesh 03:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Memorial "Fighters for Socialism" at the South Cemetery in Halle (Saale) . --Romzig 03:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Sand bank in the "Main meadows near Ziegelanger" geotope --Plozessor 03:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anthyllis vulneraria on a small Main island south of Ziegelanger --Plozessor 03:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View through the "church window" at the "Burghäuser Blick" viewpoint (towards the church in Burghausen/Münnerstadt) --Plozessor 03:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Neues Rathaus (München) facade --Wilfredor 03:07, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Panoramic of Innsbruck --Wilfredor 03:07, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted, too much noise, actual subject (Innsbruck) too hazy, description not mentioning the object in foreground, the mountain in background and the viewpoint. --Plozessor 03:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Done Thanks --Wilfredor 12:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Marienplatz (München) --Wilfredor 03:07, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bicycle parking in Deutsches Museum - Building --Wilfredor 03:07, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Graphosoma italicum. --Romzig 02:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sanctuary of Our Lady of Nazaré, Portugal --Bgag 02:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Too much sky on the right side IMO. Otherwise very good. --Екатерина Борисова 02:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cabo da Roca Lighthouse, Portugal --Bgag 02:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cabo da Roca Lighthouse, Portugal --Bgag 02:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Top down view of interior of the Church of the Exaltation of the Cross, Belaya Gora, Perm Krai, Russia. By User:Ted.ns --Екатерина Борисова 01:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden Transfiguration church of Izhma Pogost, Arkhangelsk Oblast, Russia. By User:Александр Антонов гугл-картовский --Екатерина Борисова 01:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Bgag 02:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flowers of apple tree in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mount 'n Mist Resort with background, Econy (Akoni), The Nilgiris --Tagooty 01:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Field with radish, Hullathy, Udhagai taluk, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu --Tagooty 01:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Field with beetroot (Beta vulgaris), Hullathy, Udhagai taluk, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu --Tagooty 01:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:25, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose for now because of misidentification. These shiny leaves are quite different from the dull leaves of Raphanus sativus. This is almost certainly Beta vulgaris. BTW, the preceding image File:Radish_Field_Hullathy_Nov24_A7CR_05179.jpg may be correctly identified. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
@Robert Flogaus-Faust:Done Thanks for catching this mistake. I've corrected the description and CAT, and requested renaming of the file. --Tagooty 04:15, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Field with carrots and sprinklers, Hullathy, The Nilgiris --Tagooty 01:03, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Landscape of Causse Comtal in Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Germanus church in Saint-Georges-de-Luzençon in commune of Millau, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hôtel Le Normant d'Ayssenes in Rodez, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bousquet Castle in commune of Montpeyroux, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Streetlight shaped like 'W', Windsor, Ontario, 2025-06-01 --Crisco 1492 00:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ambassador Bridge, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-06-01 --Crisco 1492 00:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed at right. --Sebring12Hrs 00:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Done. Thank you. --Crisco 1492 01:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grand Marais Drain, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-06-01 --Crisco 1492 00:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Colchester Beach and Harbour, Colchester, Ontario, 2025-06-01 --Crisco 1492 00:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Colchester Schoolhouse, Colchester, Ontario, 2025-06-01 --Crisco 1492 00:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs more precise description and CAT of the subject --Tagooty 01:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Done, thank you. --Crisco 1492 01:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:06, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
June 3, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: A Mandapa infront of Pampa Sarovar --I.Mahesh 21:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Boulders at Hanuman temple on Anjanadri --I.Mahesh 21:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Anjanadri Hill in Hampi (Vertical) --I.Mahesh 21:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Metro Ticket machines in Bavaria, from Munich --Wilfredor 21:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hercules catches the Erymanthian boar. Statuette in the Munich Residenzmuseum --Wilfredor 21:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Shadows at the edge are distracting. --Crisco 1492 00:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Done Thanks --Wilfredor 01:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support QI for me. Gradient at thumbnail is much less pronounced at full resolution. --Crisco 1492 08:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Isartor in Munich --Wilfredor 21:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi RS2 Avant at MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 20:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Opel Frontera C Electric in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 20:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Moscow --Lvova 18:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW iX in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 21:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Audi A6 Avant C9 in Sutttgart --Alexander-93 18:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Volvo EX90 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 18:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Thyme in the nature reserve Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide --FlocciNivis 16:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The warden's house of the Motte Kempten --FlocciNivis 16:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:45, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The Saufang-Pond in Friedrichsthal --FlocciNivis 16:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Oregano in the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 16:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Very small part of image is in focus and flowers are blown out --Екатерина Борисова 01:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Building at the Osseck Stadion in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Building at the Osseck Stadion in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Fire lookout tower in Suzdal --Perituss 13:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Spherical panorama on the Bridge of Spies in St. James's Park, London. --Domob 13:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Rhagastis binoculata - Dorsal side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 11:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rhagastis binoculata - △ Ventral side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 11:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 13:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nyceryx tacita - Dorsal side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 11:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nyceryx tacita - △ Ventral side - male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 11:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2002 Toyota Opa i --TTTNIS 10:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2018 Suzuki Solio Bandit Hybrid MV --TTTNIS 10:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rear view of 2018 Suzuki Solio Bandit Hybrid MV --TTTNIS 10:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2010 Honda Freed Spike G --TTTNIS 10:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rear view of 2010 Honda Freed Spike G --TTTNIS 10:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 18:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: An old iron door and stone wall, Edincik, Turkey. Kızıl 09:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Hillside in Sudochye reserve. Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan. By User:Dilmurad91 --Красный 08:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Karakalpak man at the saline. Barsakelmas reserve, Kungrad District, Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan. By User:Dilmurad91 --Красный 08:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Kızıl 09:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Manhole cover at Ryskulov street. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 08:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Manhole cover at the corner of Isanova and Tashkentskaya streets. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 08:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, CzechiaThis is a photo of a cultural monument of the Czech Republic,number: --Plánovací kalendář 08:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Stepro 12:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 08:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, CzechiaThis is a photo of a cultural monument of the Czech Republic,number: --Plánovací kalendář 08:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asian Koel in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asian Koel in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Asian Koel in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Asian Openbill in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Asian Openbill in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Aerial View of Bahubali Hill and Badi Lake. by User:Lalitr1 --UnpetitproleX 07:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Posterized. --Milseburg 14:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-AMG E 53 Coupé --MB-one 07:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Snowboarding at ski resort Sölden --MB-one 07:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lynx Eventer at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 07:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Škoda 35T for Chemnitzer Verkehrs-AG at Innotrans 2018 --MB-one 07:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Brekr fatbike at Cyclingworld Europe 2024 in Meerbusch --MB-one 07:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Eborense ferry at sunset, Estação Fluvial de Belém, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 06:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old Gravestone in Germany, Graveyard Güldenplan in Aachen --Grunpfnul 06:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bagpipe player statue --Romainbehar 06:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good enough (although the end of the bagpipe is slightly out of focus). --Benjism89 10:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Poblado de La Atalayita, Fuerteventura --Mike Peel 06:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Poblado de La Atalayita --Mike Peel 06:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Myrtillocactus cochal at Jardin de Cactus --Mike Peel 06:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Micranthocereus albicephalus at Jardin de Cactus --Mike Peel 06:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Soehrensia huascha at Jardin de Cactus --Mike Peel 06:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - Clock tower and part of the façade of University palace --Benjism89 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment The person at the lower right corner could be removed with AI. --Sebring12Hrs 07:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - Via Cartaro, a street with white houses typical of the Lama neighbourhood --Benjism89 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - View of the white houses of the Lama neighborhood from the small square at the corner of Arco Mastrovito and Mercadante streets. In the foreground, a restaurant --Benjism89 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - Magli palace - Right capital of the portal --Benjism89 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palace in Korytów --Jacek Halicki 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk in Niwa 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk in Niwa 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality --ArildV 06:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk in Niwa 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk in Niwa 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Fullerton Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Singapore Pools headquarters, Middle Road, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Fullerton Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marina Mandarin Hotel, Nicoll Highway, Singapore --Poco a poco 05:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Object in the bottom right corner should be eleminated IMO --Ermell 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Done --Poco a poco 21:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktstraße 89 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktstraße 52-54 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Holy Cross church in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gerberstraße 20 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gerberstraße 24 in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russian flags on a ship in Saint Petersburg --Ermell 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Orthophoto of Rettern --Ermell 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Orthophoto of Rettern --Ermell 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial photo of Rettern --Ermell 05:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 9th century sandstone panel depicting the eight-armed Hindu goddess Chamunda, British Museum, UK. --Sanjay Acharya 05:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lobster traps in the small habour Björholmen, Tjörn. --ArildV 04:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Fishing boat GG 844 Idunn. --ArildV 04:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Björshuvudets naturreservat (nature reserve). --ArildV 04:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential tower Karlatornet. --ArildV 04:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poppingawier. Residential house Fiskerssteech 2.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC) - Promotion
Persons arm at the left should be cropped out. --Ermell 06:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
@Ermell>*Done. New version. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:28, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Poppingawier. Residential house Fiskerssteech 2.
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Saint Petersburg --Lvova 04:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Indian white-eye. By User:Sudipta Maulik --ROCKY 03:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asian green bee-eater. By User:Bcsarker --ROCKY 03:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue-tailed bee-eater. By User:Princepauljoy --ROCKY 03:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former inner-German border in the "Alster ground with border stripe" nature reserve, also part of "Green Belt Thuringia" national natural monument --Plozessor 03:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Disturbing white and black spots in the sky. Flies? And the perspective should be corrected. See the info board at the right side. --Ermell 06:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
@Ermell: Oops, thx for spotting! No idea what those white spots are, I tried to fix both issues. --Plozessor 17:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Closewing position of Meandrusa lachinus (Fruhstorfer, 1902) - Brown Gorgon. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 02:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Romzig 02:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Closewing position of Charaxes narcaeus (Hewitson, 1854) - Chinese Nawab. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 02:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Closewing position of Calinaga aborica Tytler, 1915 - Dark Freak. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 02:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 20:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bell tower of the Bodbe Monastery, Sighnaghi, Georgia --Bgag 02:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Finland Railway Bridge during white nights in Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Sergnoob --Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose There are blue/purple fringes around the leaves. --Sebring12Hrs 00:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inside view of Hyperboloid Shukhov tower on the bank of Oka river near Dzerzhinsk, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, Russia. By User:Serhiomatviavelli --Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs a more precise description/CAT of the subject. --Tagooty 02:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Don't understand what's wrong with decription or categorization here. You can just click on the link in image's page summary or on the category and find the article in many languages about this object. According to the QIC rules, it is necessary to make very short descriptions and is not mandatory to make links in them. So what's the problem? -- Екатерина Борисова 03:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
This looks like the inside or top of the tower, not the whole tower. --Tagooty 03:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Done OK, I added some words to the description. -- Екатерина Борисова 15:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality, thank you. --Tagooty 03:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Open air museum of Rostselmash plant, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Electricity distribution to many houses from one pole, Econy, The Nilgiris --Tagooty 01:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mount 'n Mist Resort with mountain background, Econy (Akoni), The Nilgiris --Tagooty 01:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination House on Kuprin Avenue in Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 00:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Left area of the building is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 00:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dolmen de la Fabiere in commune of La Cavalerie, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in La Capelle Saint-Martin, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Castle of Taurines in commune of Centres, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 00:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Disturbing object to the right of the tower (a drone?). Maybe remove? --ArildV 06:51, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tesla Model 3 charging, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-31 --Crisco 1492 00:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:51, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
June 2, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Bee on blooming muscari. Tashkent Botanical Garden, Uzbekistan. By User:26D --Екатерина Борисова 23:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remiz’s nest in Ugom Chatkal nature reserve, Uzbekistan. By User:26D --Екатерина Борисова 23:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Stream in Urungach natural monument site, Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Panpanchik --Екатерина Борисова 23:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The upper left corner is unsharp, the lower left and right corners are unsharp, but leaves in the middle are sharp. So I don't know how to vote here. --Sebring12Hrs 00:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock formations in Urungach natural monument site, Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan. By User:Panpanchik --Екатерина Борисова 23:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Person being baptized in Evangel Pentecostal Church Quebec City, Canada --Wilfredor 23:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Baptismal basin appears warped (slightly arced) --Crisco 1492 00:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
I remember that the pastor had been searching for a portable baptismal pool or baptistry for quite some time. Eventually, another church agreed to lend theirs, but we had to travel to their location. To my surprise, it was a metal container that looked old and warped with age. I believe this might have caused the edge to appear the way it does. However, the focal length used in the photo, over 200mm, also makes proper framing difficult. In this case, I can't say for certain whether the distortion is due to the baptismal tank itself or a framing error on my part. --Wilfredor 01:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Support Fair enough. If it's a portable basin, "straight" is a relative term. Good quality. --Crisco 1492 08:55, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ordination of Pastor Bédo Kokora Jean Didier at Evangel Church, Quebec City --Wilfredor 23:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 19:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 19:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Moscow City district --Perituss 18:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cairn at the top of the Dent de Jaman. --Espandero 17:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
This (with a temporary balanced stone) is not a cairn. It might be a work of art... --Charlesjsharp 21:39, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Charlesjsharp: from Wikipedia: "A cairn is a human-made pile (or stack) of stones raised for a purpose, usually as a marker [...] especially to mark the summits of mountains [...]. They vary in size from small piles of stones to entire artificial hills." When I took the picture the pile of rock was marking the summit of the Dent de Jaman. It was there when I reached the top and it was still here when I left. What might have happened to it afterwards is not really our concern. There is no temporality in the definition of a cairn, so to me the pile of rock in this picture is a cairn. Thanks for your understanding. -Espandero 17:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Clutch of White Bird Eggs Nestled in Dried GrassI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 17:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
was it legal/wise to approach the nest? --Charlesjsharp 21:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Oppose Noisy and blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 00:31, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Deutsche Eishockey Liga 2024/25, Play-off final, match 5: Eisbären Berlin vs. Kölner Haie (7:0) – Korbinian Geibel (Eisbären Berlin) --Sandro Halank 16:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Stepro 12:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rieses & Müller stand at Cyclingworld Europe 2024 in Meerbusch --MB-one 16:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Diamond DA62 at EBACE 2019 --MB-one 16:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: BMW 501/502 at IAA Mobility 2021 in Munich --MB-one 16:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The background looks clearly overexposed. Could you fix that? --Sandro Halank 16:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View along the Sondermüllerweg to the Brey-Mill in Freising --FlocciNivis 15:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View from the Fortress Marienberg to the Alte Mainbrücke in Würzburg --FlocciNivis 15:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination View to the church St. Bartholomäus in Nuremberg-Wöhrd --FlocciNivis 15:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 09:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi Q4 e-tron in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 15:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 09:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Munich Champions League Final 2025 - Fan Zone --Alexander-93 15:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
There is CA at the borders of the picture which needs to be removed and PC needs to be performed --FlocciNivis 16:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, I reduced CA. Wchich PC do you mean? --Alexander-93 19:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
The building and the tower crane are leaning --FlocciNivis 17:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panoramic of Praia do Leblon, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil --Wilfredor 12:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Linyphia triangularis. --Romzig 12:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Asian Green Bee-eater in West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 11:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support On the edge, but slightly above it for me. --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ardea cinerea in Rodez (district of Layoule), Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:48, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The bird is unsharp and very noisy. --Екатерина Борисова 01:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Parkview Square and Andaz Hotel, Singapore --Poco a poco 06:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Salinas del Carmen --Mike Peel 05:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The nose of of Boeing TB-29 Superfortress ‘469972’ "Doc” at Hagerstown Regional Airport, Maryland --Acroterion 01:51, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
That your reflection to the right of the gnome? Should probably retouch that, it spoils the composition a bit. --Plozessor 03:11, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Not me, I made sure when I shot it, but I should be able to take it out. Acroterion 03:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Plozessor: Fixed. Acroterion 03:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cruise boat Macassa Bay passing Renaissance Centre, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-31 --Crisco 1492 00:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
CAs on the Chevrolet building. Look at the facade. --Sebring12Hrs 00:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Fixed. Thank you for looking. --Crisco 1492 10:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
June 1, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Montane woodcreeper (Lepidocolaptes lacrymiger aequatorialis) --Charlesjsharp 20:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
The bark of the tree is blown out and disturbing --Lmbuga 23:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Oppose And colors are too bright and unatural to me. --Sebring12Hrs 00:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cornice with Piccolomini family coat of arms (Palazzo Piccolomini in Pienza) . -- Anna.Massini 19:13, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 00:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Previously unassessed Dagestan carpet on a felt base --Lvova 18:27, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Sitia harbour at night. Top center is Kazarma fortress. Sitia, Lasithi, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 18:18, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Shooting by night is not easy. Good colors and sharpness. --Sebring12Hrs 00:21, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination meadow brown (Maniola jurtina). --Romzig 17:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Top of the wing is unsharp. --Sebring12Hrs 00:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Faro Punta A Atalaia, Lieiro, Cervo, province of Lugo, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 14:40, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Tilted --Benjism89 17:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you and sorry, but CW or CCW? (see note) If you look at the vertical lines on the left side, the picture is tilted in the opposite direction to the vertical lines on the right side. In short, the perspective correction of the picture is minimal because the photograph was taken from below. Tilted CW or CCW?, please. I tried to do it right--Lmbuga 22:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
You might prefer this other version (File:2025 Faro Punta A Atalaia. Lieiro. Cervo. Provincia de Lugo. Galiza.jpg). The lighthouse is distorted, but the perspective correction works (see notes). --Lmbuga 22:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
I have no problem with perspective correction (I don't think it's necessary here and I'm not sure the lighthouse is a perfect cylinder anyway), but with the wind vane being not vertical. It's the one thing that could be expected to be vertical here. --Benjism89 06:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2014 Toyota Prius α Touring Selection --TTTNIS 13:40, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2001 Toyota Crown Royal Saloon Four --TTTNIS 13:40, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Basketball-Bundesliga 2024/25, play-off quarter-final, match 2: ALBA Berlin vs. ratiopharm Ulm (72:62) – Justin Bean (ALBA Berlin) --Sandro Halank 13:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Basketball-Bundesliga 2024/25, play-off quarter-final, match 2: ALBA Berlin vs. ratiopharm Ulm (72:62) – Ben Saraf (ratiopharm Ulm) --Sandro Halank 13:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basketball-Bundesliga 2024/25, play-off quarter-final, match 2: ALBA Berlin vs. ratiopharm Ulm (72:62) – Noa Essengue (ratiopharm Ulm) --Sandro Halank 13:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 08:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Close wing Nactering of Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Plain Tiger (Female) --Sandipoutsider 13:00, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Maison rue de Trazegnies 104 à Monceau-sur-Sambre (Charleroi) --Jmh2o 11:09, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Caravan in the desert. Morocco, Sahara.English: This image was selected as a picture of the week on the Czech Wikipedia for 30th week, 2018. By User:Black Sickle --Ziv 07:52, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. Nearly. @Black Sickle: The dust spot should be removed. I'd set a notice to the dust spot. --XRay 08:01, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Black Sickle and Ziv: Please don't forget the dust spot. --XRay 14:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Too bad you didn't respond. It's such a beautiful photo. But the dust spot should be removed. --XRay 05:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Audi Q5 Sportback GU in Leonberg --Alexander-93 07:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: :Ford F-150 (fourteenth generation) at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 07:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Abarth 600e Scorpionissima in Bietigheim --Alexander-93 07:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (fourth generation) in Bietigheim --Alexander-93 07:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Nissan Interstar III in Bietigheim --Alexander-93 07:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ten Square, Landmark of Good, Singapore --Poco a poco 06:47, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Strange artefacts at the bottom with the traffic lights and the green light on the left. Happens with people or cars in long exposures, but traffic lights usuallly don't walk :) --Benjism89 18:16, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Done --Poco a poco 21:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Civilian War Memorial, Singapore --Poco a poco 06:47, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Holy Cross church in Landau in der Pfalz, Rhineland-P., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:01, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lahic, Ismailli Rayon, Azerbaijan --Bgag 02:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
May 31, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Hamburg, Neuland with nature reserve HH-706 'Schweenssand', special area of conservation DE2526-302 'Heuckenlock/Schweensand', behind LSG HH-2051 'Hamburger Elbe' and SAC DE2526-305 'Hamburger Unterelbe', behind Wilhelmsburg, NSG 702 'Heuckenlock' und SAC DE2526-302 'Heuckenlock/Schweenssand' --KaiBorgeest 23:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Matt Walker during UCI MTB world cup in Loudenvielle 2025 --Shougissime 20:55, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Almost great! but too low crop for me :( --Lvova 10:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Audi Q6 e-tron Sportback in Leonberg --Alexander-93 18:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Children's Museum, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Khatchkar in Sevanavank --Lvova 07:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Phalaenopsis --Lvova 07:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Ruin in the abandoned quarry outside Breitbrunn in the Haßberge district --Ermell 07:49, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Quality is good but a more specific cat for the subject would be good --Poco a poco 08:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Done Thanks for the review.
--Ermell 09:18, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Asian Emerald Dove in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
A bit noisy, isn't focused well on eyes --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Asian Emerald Dove in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
A bit noisy, isn't focused well on eyes --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Asian Emerald Dove in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
A bit noisy, isn't focused well on eyes --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Asian Emerald Dove in Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:38, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
A bit noisy, isn't focused well on eyes --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The remains of Pier 55, New York City --Mike Peel 03:07, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Little Island at Pier 55 seen from Pier 57, New York --Mike Peel 03:07, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Public baths building, Tyumen, Russia. By User:Ted.ns --Екатерина Борисова 02:10, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Right side leaning out -- too much PC? --Tagooty 02:26, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
I don't really know :) --Екатерина Борисова 02:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mountain overlooking Akoni village, Udhagai taluk, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India --Tagooty 01:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Surprisingly not sharp and has CA's on upper trees. --Екатерина Борисова 02:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
@Екатерина Борисова: I've sharpened the image and reduced the bluish tint on the trees at left and right. Please review. --Tagooty 03:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
It looks sharper now, but unfortunately CA's on branches are still here. --Екатерина Борисова 01:22, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
May 30, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Love Park Philadelphia (May) 2025 --Boaventuravinicius 22:33, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Only the center of the image is in focus. --Екатерина Борисова 02:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Paeonia rockii in Jardin botanique de Montréal, Quebec, Canada --Wilfredor 21:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Supermarket in recife, Pernambuco, Brazil --Wilfredor 21:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I think we should mark "de minimis" for all of the packaging, assuming it meets the threshold. --Crisco 1492 23:12, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Pilatus PC-12-45 - C-GSAG from Air Richelieu - Montreal Flying Club at LFBT airport --Shougissime 20:16, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The author is not clear if you, and please format the date in the information page. --Wilfredor 21:11, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Airport terminal of Tarbes Lourdes Pyrénées Airport --Shougissime 20:16, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment Perspective distortion and some CAs on the building near the left edge - should be fixed --Jakubhal 05:23, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: March of the 2025 Hof pride parade --PantheraLeo1359531 19:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
needs slight perspective correction - look at the verticals on the left building (very left window line and right line of the fassade) --Tuxyso 20:06, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: BMW E39 (1995) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz C 55 T AMG (S202) One of 772 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 17:09, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 16:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Extrem perspective. If you correct it that way, at least the verticals should be straight which is not the case here. --Tuxyso 19:51, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Done perspective corrected. --Plánovací kalendář 19:43, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality now. --Tuxyso 19:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kobeřice, Opava District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 16:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
CAs on the wire, even better: disturbing wires should be removed. --Tuxyso 20:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Done CA removed. I personally don't like retouching or removing objects from documentary photos. --Plánovací kalendář 19:43, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality now. --Tuxyso 19:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View across the Hauptmarkt in Nuremberg to the New Town Hall --FlocciNivis 10:05, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Sharpness on the left and right edges could be better, bareley OK for me. But the sky should be cropped much tighter. --Tuxyso 20:15, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kia EV9 at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 06:36, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Paulownia tomentosa in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. --Екатерина Борисова 01:17, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Logge di Raffaello in Stieglitz Museum --Lvova 00:10, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Khatchkar in Sevanavank --Lvova 00:10, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Khatchkar in Sevanavank --Lvova 00:10, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
May 29, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Punta Arxente and Salseiras islands from the ruins of San Tirso --Lmbuga 21:06, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Plaques in the Holy Cross Church in Warsaw, Poland. --Phyrexian 20:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ilıcaoba, Gönen, Balıkesir, Turkey. Kızıl 20:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Pink rose in Turkey. Kızıl 20:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Greater ani (Crotophaga major) --Charlesjsharp 20:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Greater ani (Crotophaga major) --Charlesjsharp 20:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Basilica of Our Lady (interior), Geneva. --Terragio67 19:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Level of detail is borderline and highlights are blown --Benjism89 20:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
The issue is the DoF for me. --Sebring12Hrs 20:33, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: PESM Núcleo Cunha por Luiz Alves --Rodrigo.Argenton 19:43, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Somehow oversharpened, especially visible in the background. --Plozessor 02:46, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Volkswagen Tayron II at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 19:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Škoda Elroq First Edition at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 19:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--TTTNIS 10:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roebuck in Kröllwitz in Halle (Saale), Germany. --Romzig 19:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Blurry and noisy, sorry --Lvova 14:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Oppose Agree with Lvova, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 02:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) chick at the pond Kirchteich in Halle (Saale)-Neustadt . --Romzig 18:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rhinopalpa polynice (Cramer,1779) - Wizard. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 15:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2021 Toyota Camry WS --TTTNIS 14:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2014-2015 Mitsubishi eK Custom G --TTTNIS 14:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kobylisy district in Prague --Perituss 13:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It seems to be a bit out of focus. --Sebring12Hrs 00:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Wall of the St Paul church in Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Dovecote in Limagne in commune Salles-la-Source, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 12:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality and nice winter light --ArildV 12:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Pokrovsky Monastery in Suzdal --Perituss 12:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It seems the white wall is leaning. Look at left. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 12:41, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Otranto (Apulia, Italy) - Ruin lizard (Podarcis siculus) on a rock --Benjism89 10:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Major areas of the body are sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 00:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View from the Château des ducs de Lorraine in Sierck-les-Bain --FlocciNivis 09:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Everything is leaning to the left and there are dust spots everywhere. --Sebring12Hrs 18:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sheep's-Bit in the nature reserve Limbacher Sanddüne --FlocciNivis 09:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The flower looks sharp, but there is a lot of empty space (not really empty but it is the background) in the photo. --Sebring12Hrs 00:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View through the Kempter Straße to the Kempter Tor in Memmingen --FlocciNivis 09:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Is there any issue with white balance ? Colors looks very warm to me. --Sebring12Hrs 18:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
I tried to fix that --FlocciNivis 17:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View across the Main in Fraknfurt to the Renten tower, the Bernus building and the Saalhof-Chapel --FlocciNivis 09:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Is there any issue with white balance ? Colors looks very warm to me. --Sebring12Hrs 18:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
I tried to fix that --FlocciNivis 17:04, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marina Bay, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Quite noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 15:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Done --Poco a poco 12:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park in Korytów 5 --Jacek Halicki 07:45, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Purple CAs in the branches. --Sebring12Hrs 15:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Support Good quality. You do the job, but you didn't answer me. Good now. --Sebring12Hrs 00:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Elymnias patna (Westwood,1851) - Blue-striped Palmfly. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 07:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Need more categories and also need more sharpness --A S M Jobaer 06:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness is fine for a low DoF photograph like this, but a category for the species is missing. The photo also contains a watermark, rendering it ineligible for QI. ReneeWrites 19:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The body of the butterfly is also not sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 00:12, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door in Tbilisi --Lvova 06:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Khatchkars in Sevanavank --Lvova 06:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Previously unassessed --Lvova 06:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Khatchkars in Sevanavank --Lvova 06:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument to Vital Decoster --Romainbehar 05:29, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Not my favorite crop for sculptures, but still ok. --Sebring12Hrs 00:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Summit of the Kirchberg (also called "Hünenhügel", "giants' hill") near Schönbach (Ebelsbach) --Plozessor 03:29, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Staircase, Ñuñoa House of Culture. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Maybe it's possible to make more symmetrical crop? --Lvova 10:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Water fountain, Ñuñoa House of Culture. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bandeiras dos Estados Unidos da América e de Nova Iorque ao lado do Museu Metropolitano --Boaventuravinicius 03:00, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
May 28, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Startech Performance 710 on Bentley Bentayga at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 20:26, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: English: SAY 29 at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen --MB-one 20:26, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: BMW M4 of Red Bull at Essen Motor Show 2023 --MB-one 20:26, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: General view of Tlemcen (Algeria) --Riad Salih 20:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Construction work for a new tramway track on Wenceslas Square in May 2025, seen from the stairs in front of the National Museum --Kritzolina 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Construction work for a new tramway track on Wenceslas Square in May 2025, seen from the stairs in front of the National Museum --Kritzolina 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Construction work for a new tramway track on Wenceslas Square in May 2025, seen from the stairs in front of the National Museum --Kritzolina 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Detail of a door at Palác Pachtů z Rájova, Prague --Kritzolina 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Detail of a door at Palác Pachtů z Rájova, Prague --Kritzolina 19:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Greenfinch in the Kröllwitz district of Halle (Saale). --Romzig 19:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz W177 (2022) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: BMW G45 X3 M50 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 19:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hugo Thiel bust in the Landwirtschaftliche Hochschule Berlin, Germany. --Phyrexian 17:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Detail of the Warszaw Rowing Club building in Warsaw, Poland. --Phyrexian 17:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: City gate of Porto Ercole, Italy --DnaX 16:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment Perspective should be corrected. Also some
chromatic aberration near the top edge --Jakubhal 17:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Entrada (Socavón) de la Mina de Santa Bárbara, Huancavelica, Perú. By User:Dalphard mar --Candy WikiAcción 16:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A pier at the Lake Starnberg --FlocciNivis 08:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A Map on a flower in the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 08:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
A bit blurry IMHO --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Flowers at Luzhkov Bridge --Lvova 08:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The background is really blurry, maybe too much since the setting is intended to characterize the main subject of the picture - otherwise quite common. Those are Petunias. --Harlock81 12:17, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, the category is added. --Lvova 12:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A fountain in Marientahl Park --Lvova 08:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dancing statues --Romainbehar 06:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Technically nice, but I don't love compositiontoo much (the left corner). --Lvova 11:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Otranto (Apulia, Italy) - Coast and city viewed from Gradoni beach --Benjism89 05:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
May 27, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Hamburg-Neugraben, nature reserve/SAC 'Fischbeker Heide', part 'Neugrabener Heide' --KaiBorgeest 21:45, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose It seems overprocessed. The textures are strange and not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 00:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View from the Reichsbrücke to the residential building at the Rudolf-Nurejew-Promenade, Vienna --FlocciNivis 17:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment There are a few dust spots on the sky, please fix. Otherwise good quality --Jakubhal 18:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Done thank you for the feedback --FlocciNivis 17:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Close wing position Nectaring activity of Hypolimnas bolina (Linnaeus, 1758) - Great Eggfly (Female) --Sandipoutsider 11:45, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I don't want to reject it and I'm fine with it being accepted as is, but I think it lacks focus. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mating pair of Mycalesis mineus (Linnaeus, 1758) - Dark-branded Bushbrown --Sandipoutsider 11:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I don't want to reject it and I'm fine with it being accepted as is, but I think it is a little bit noisy. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Fork-tailed woodnymph (Thalurania furcata viridipectus) male --Charlesjsharp 11:34, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I don't want to reject it and I'm fine with it being accepted as is by others, but I think it lacks focus. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: WikiOrchestra performaning during the closing ceremony of Wikimania 2024 in Katowice --MB-one 07:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
From my online participation I can imagine that it was hard to make a photo, but at least because of the girl from the left side I'm not sure that it can be QI --Lvova 14:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Question I don't fully understand. Do you mean the ukulele player? What's wrong with her? --MB-one 16:07, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
She is stretched in width by distortion at the edge of the wide-angle lens --Lvova 16:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Civilian War Memorial, Singapore --Poco a poco 06:50, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It's too distorted to me from that point of view. I think a perspective correction would be good. --Sebring12Hrs 09:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC)New version with less perspective correction --Poco a poco 08:41, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road in Ala Archa gorge. Chuy Region, Kyrgyzstan. By User:Baydastann --Красный 05:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Overprocessed to me, look at the road textures. --Sebring12Hrs 23:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
May 26, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination An altar in the church St. Lorenz in Kempten --FlocciNivis 16:31, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
The photo was made a little bit lefter and lower than the center, and the right column became not straight (and not because of it, but a bit noisy). Also probably a small crop by sides could be useful, to remove small fragments (but unfortunately it will not help with the columns) --Lvova 14:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback. I tried to fix the issues you mentioned. Is thi okay now? --FlocciNivis 17:25, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Support Much better, let's try to promote :) --Lvova 18:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View at the Big Chuy canal from the Elebesov street bridge. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 06:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed --FlocciNivis 16:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Upwards view of Alley of the Youth from Frunze street. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 06:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Some CAs in the leaves, otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 23:18, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Some CAs on the top of the trees. --Sebring12Hrs 01:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi SQ5 (GU) at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 06:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Some verticals on the building in the background are not perfectly straight and a PC could be applied, but IMHO it is fine especially since the car is the subject (and it is not very off). --Domob 13:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Škoda Elroq in Leonberg --Alexander-93 06:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
May 25, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: The remains of part C of the partially collapsed Carola Bridge in Dresden in May 2025. --Stepro 17:58, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Overexposed and so lack details. --Екатерина Борисова 03:09, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Südpark Düsseldorf, Germany --A. Öztas 17:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It is very hard to make a QI against the sun. --Lvova 14:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
And PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Laab im Walde, Blick von Südwesten --Granada 16:49, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Spots in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 21:09, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
I've removed the very same dust spot as in the other nomination. --Granada 05:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
I see, but what about the clone stamp trace in the middle of the sky. --Ermell 19:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Argh! I've uploaded the wrong image, this one is still untouched and I won't be able to fix it until sunday evening --Granada 08:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
dust spot finally removed --Granada 16:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
But there is still one at the top right side. Sorry. --Ermell 22:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Oppose Too many dust spots for QI --Granada 05:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Granada: You can't decline your own nomination. Do you want to withdraw? I set it back to nomination. --Milseburg 20:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Italy, Noto, Palazzo Ducezio --Berthold Werner 15:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Is it possible to improve a bit the perspective ? Otherwise ggod. --Sebring12Hrs 15:22, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
What exactly is wrong with the perspective? --Berthold Werner 14:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
The columns are leaning. I can't imagine this in reality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Support Columns are ok for me. --Lvova 09:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Orlová, Karviná District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 09:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good monument, but the background tree is very noisy :( --Lvova 14:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Done I tried to improve that. --Plánovací kalendář 19:43, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm not sure, need other's opinions. --Lvova 19:41, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Prague Ham (Pražská šunka) being roasted over wood fire at a food stall on the Old Town Square in Prague --Kritzolina 08:03, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
I am sorry, but very blurry for me. --Lvova 14:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Oppose as Lvova --Grunpfnul 06:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Northstar Axis 3.4 rhib at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen --MB-one 07:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Maybe it needs some PC. --Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ivanov street photographed from the Abugaliyev street. Balkhash, Karaganda Region, Kazakhstan.. By User:Красный --Екатерина Борисова 02:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Sharpness is borderline for a well-lit exterior scene. Small CAs on the streetlights --Benjism89 18:44, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
May 24, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Koch tribal girl in Bangladesh. --Kaim Amin 15:47, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
I don't want to reject it, and I'm fine with the picture being accepted as is, but there are a lot of artifacts on the girl's skin. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Oppose Sorry, a beautiful photo but but the focus is wrong, the leaves in front of the woman are in focus while the woman is slightly out of focus --ArildV 06:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Prague Ham (Pražská šunka) being roasted over wood fire at a food stall on the Old Town Square in Prague --Kritzolina 15:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
A deeper DoF would have been needed here IMO, to have it sharp to the end of the bone --Benjism89 18:44, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) chicks being fed. --Romzig 10:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I don't want to reject it, and I'm fine with the picture being accepted as is, but for my taste the photo is a bit noisy and the heads are out of focus. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I like the picture, but I also see that it's not perfect. It's OK for me to reject the picture. (I like this contest, I'm learning a lot here, and I find the users' opinions interesting.). --Romzig 19:12, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
May 23, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Windows of 380, Zhibek Zholu avenue, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. --Красный 11:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
I would crop the purple thing at the left bootom corner. --Sebring12Hrs 23:36, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Done, thank you for your comment. --Красный 20:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I think it's OK now. --Екатерина Борисова 02:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination SanDisk 240GB SSD Hard Drive à Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 09:09, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
I don't want to reject it and I'm fine with it being accepted as is, but it's a bit blurry for my taste. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Oppose Barrel distortion, lack of DOF(gets Blurry downwards) --Grunpfnul 06:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Joseph's Church, Singapore --Poco a poco 06:10, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Possible to improve the perspective ? --Olivier LPB 09:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Could you be more precise? verticals look vetical --Poco a poco 23:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)New version --Poco a poco 20:33, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Support QI imo. --ArildV 07:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
May 22, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Scania L 360 at Nufam 2023 --MB-one 19:21, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Overall quality is good but maybe it needs some PC --Екатерина Борисова 03:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
May 20, 2025
[edit]May 19, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Interior of Ulm Minster --Alexander-93 15:41, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Description should be improve. --Olivier LPB 11:05, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Done--Alexander-93 19:11, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The Mohammadan Watch Tower is the largest and most detailed watchtower in the Hampi ruins. --Rohit14400 06:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment When I check the verticals near the door, I think PC is needed a bit. --Sebring12Hrs 07:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Done PC corrected. --Rohit14400 17:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, but I don't see a big difference. --Sebring12Hrs 06:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The Hazara Rama Temple dating back to the 15th century, is renowned for its intricate carvings and murals depicting the Ramayana. --Rohit14400 06:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 07:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Done PC corrected. --Rohit14400 17:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, but I don't see a big difference. --Sebring12Hrs 06:37, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
May 18, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Sunset at Table Land, Panchgani --Rangan Datta Wiki 14:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Dust spots. See notes. --Sebring12Hrs 00:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Comment There are at least other 3 dust spots, and are quite tricky to be removed, since there are faint layers of air in the sky. --Harlock81 16:52, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not done. --Sebring12Hrs 22:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
May 17, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: SNCF Class Z 23500 TER Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes at Montmelian railway station, track 1. --Remontees 14:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment PC is needed. Check the verticals at left. --Sebring12Hrs 21:34, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
This is the perspective, the photo looks straight to me overall. --Remontees 23:29, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Le train est dans une courbe donc penché, c'est normal. Mais ce qui devrait être vertical, c'est le poteau de l'abri à gauche et le support caténaire à droite --Benjism89 18:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
May 16, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Flying black pirate flag with white skull and crossbones
--F. Riedelio 10:36, 16 May 2025 (UTC) - Review
PC is needed. The mast should be vertical. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 20:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
New version: PC improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Comment Thanks but I didn't noticed the CAs at the top of the flag. --Sebring12Hrs 20:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
New version:chromatic aberration improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 19:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Flying black pirate flag with white skull and crossbones
May 8, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Russian military equipment heading to the parade is decorated with the St. George ribbon and the Gungnir symbol. --Lvova 17:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Comment Tilted at left. --Sebring12Hrs 10:01, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Checked, rechecked... I think you have an optical illusion and it isn't. --Lvova 19:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
All vertical street furniture are leaning the same direction, which suggests not only that perspective correction would be welcome, but also that the image is tilted as Seb wrote --Benjism89 19:21, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
I see two lampposts that are not straight simply because they are on an overpass. There is no need to straighten things that are not straight in reality. --Lvova 12:42, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
The sign in the left foreground and the vertical bars of the fence along the sidewalk are also slightly tilted, all in the same direction --Benjism89 19:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}
or{{oppose}}
will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add
Oppose and
Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
File:Haubentaucher_mit_Beute-20250531-RM-163022.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Great crested grebe on the old lake in the park of Seehof Castle --Ermell 07:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Looks overprocessed to me, sorry --Poco a poco 08:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 13:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per others. Denoising and sharpening overdone, and even visible in A4 size. --Smial 08:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed, probably denoising+sharpening as Smial said. Especially visible at the fish and at the head. --Plozessor 17:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Info @Poco a poco: @Sebring12Hrs: @Smial: @Plozessor: New version uploaded. Please have a look.--Ermell 19:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Now it's not so heavily processed but the lack of sharpness becomes more obvious. I don't think you can save it. --Poco a poco 20:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
File:20230107_St._Lorenz_Nürnberg_04.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Spiraling staircases in the church St. Lorenz in Nuremberg --FlocciNivis 16:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Too noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 00:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- I performed noise reduction and ask for re-evaluation of the image --FlocciNivis 17:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support New version seems ok to me. --Plozessor 17:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --KaiBorgeest 21:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
File:AC_BD_Rathaus_Aachen_Marktturm.jpg
[edit]- Nomination City Hall of Aachen, Germany --Grunpfnul 06:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Sorry, but f/5.6 is not enough here. ISO 200 and 1/680 sec gives room for more depth of field. --Stepro 12:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- At 8mm with f5.6, the Main Subject (Tower) is more than in Focus and Even the City hall is in Focus. If a realy midly unsharp background isn't allowed anymore… --Grunpfnul 21:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Absurd perspective. Architectural verticals here, architectural verticals there - if you also correct the perspective of a photo with an already very large 120° angle of view, the result may still be geometrically correct, but this is not an architectural photo, but a caricature. “But you got everything in the frame” is not a sign of quality. Sorry for the harsh words, they are not meant personally, but these extreme wide-angle perspectives have generally got out of hand and I find them terrible. --Smial 09:14, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, i won't take it personally, but youself did some pc correction work like this - which wonders me, in view of your comment. I never wrote something like "i got everything in the Frame" and i respect your opinion, but then we should expand the rules of QI to "no pc needed for ultra wide angle" or "No Ultra wide angle pictures allowed on QI". Grunpfnul (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Question Is the given camera location exact? If so, was there a reason why you didn't step further back to get a more realistic perspective? --Plozessor 17:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support in that case. I could not find any better image of this perspective; some "professional" pictures are even more distorted. And in all other aspects it's IMO very good. --Plozessor 03:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the building looks too distorted and unnatural. Also the spire is very blurry and looks like a lump of something. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
File:2025-04-30_ALBA_Berlin_gegen_Syntainics_MBC_(Basketball-Bundesliga_2024-25)_by_Sandro_Halank–022.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Deutsche Basketball-Bundesliga 2024/25, 31st day of play: ALBA Berlin vs. Syntainics MBC (90:62) – Jānis Gailītis (coach Syntainics MBC) --Sandro Halank 16:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Sorry but not sharp although the size is really borderline --Benjism89 20:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I can count the hairs. Sharp enough for a portrait. --Stepro 12:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose 2 MP picture taken with a 24 MP full-frame camera, obviously either heavily cropped or downscaled, which both is against QI guidelines. Also, though 2 MP is considered the minimum size, it would at least have to be perfect in all other aspects, which it isn't. --Plozessor 17:31, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Bahnhof_Füssen,_Bavaria,_Germany.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Bahnhof Füssen, Bavaria, Germany --Wilfredor 12:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 21:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The top of the lamppost disappeared, look at the first version of your photo. And noise reduction is extreme to me. --Sebring12Hrs 00:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment You cut the lampost but it is not realisticat all and not beautiful. --Sebring12Hrs 06:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Low DoF could be acceptable for such a scene, but here, the only thing in focus is the face of the woman to the front right, everything else is OOF. And excessive NR resulting in unrealistic look, though I might not decline it due that alone. --Plozessor 17:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Viaduc_de_la_Gascarie_4.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Viaduct Gascarie, Rodez. --Kallerna 18:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose The perspective needs to be corrected, the bridge looks like it's falling to the right. --Wilfredor 22:49, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support IMO it's very interesting intentional angle shot. Please discuss. --Екатерина Борисова 01:47, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Екатерина, this is typically the kind of pictures where I believe perspective correction would do more harm than good. --Benjism89 09:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Екатерина and Benjism89. --Plozessor 10:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Close_wing_Basking_activity_of_Junonia_iphita_(Cramer,_1779)_-_Chocolate_Pansy_WLB_DSC_5863a.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Close wing Basking activity of Junonia iphita (Cramer, 1779) - Chocolate Pansy --Sandipoutsider 13:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Need more categorization --A S M Jobaer 06:08, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Clearly in the species category --Jakubhal 08:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- A S M Jobaer: It's not about the amount of categories but rather about their quality and the best category I can think of for a creature is the species --Poco a poco 20:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The quality of the picture also seems ok for me --Jakubhal 15:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks right to me.--Peulle 07:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good picture, proper description and categorization. --Plozessor 10:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Martina_Franca_-_Porta_di_Santo_Stefano_-_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - St. Stephen's city gate --Benjism89 10:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Distorted. --Lvova 13:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. The perspective correction is well done. --Tournasol7 06:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The right pillar of the gate seems leaning to the right, but the building right of it does not. Probably the gate itself is crooked. Otherwise good picture. --Plozessor 10:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Martina_Franca_-_Porta_di_Santo_Stefano_-_2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Martina Franca (Apulia, Italy) - St. Stephen's city gate --Benjism89 10:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Distorted. --Lvova 13:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. The perspective correction is well done. --Tournasol7 06:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think the perspective correction was done well. It could be much better with just a little effort. See here. I would rate this image as QI. Aside from that, I don't understand the file name. The statue above depicts Saint Martin. Why is it called Porta_di_Santo_Stefano? -- Spurzem 18:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment The photographer may not be positioned right in front and center of the door in reality. In your version, it seems that the photographer is refocused again, but is this really more realistic ? --Sebring12Hrs 09:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Spurzem: In many cases, I would try to position myself so that I am aligned with the building / gate I'm photographing, and then correct horizontal perpective so that the image is symmetric. But in this case, the passage under the gate is not perpendicular to the axis of the gate, so it isn't possible to align with both the gate and the passage under it. For this reason (and also because there were unaesthetic construction works right behind the gate), I chose not to align myself with the gate. As Sebring12Hrs wrote, I don't believe correcting such a large unalignment afterwards is a good idea, your version looks strange in my opinion. --Benjism89 09:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment And about the name of this picture : well, the name of this gate is Porta di Santo Stefano, although it's carrying the statue of another saint (which is the patron saint of the city so there are statues of saint Martin pretty much everywhere). Sorry but I don't decide on proper names :-) --Benjism89 09:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Due to perspective correction, it looks like the lower part of the gate is narrower than the upper one, which obviously does not correspond to reality. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Seems to me that the gate, not the picture, is leaning. --Plozessor 10:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- In the category it's not like this. Lvova 10:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Feldkirchen,_Gemeinde_Egling_05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Feldkirchen, community of Egling in Bavaria seen from the road from Thanning --Kritzolina 09:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Blurry at the right side --Екатерина Борисова 19:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Blurry, but acceptable to me. Go to CR if you want. --Sebring12Hrs 00:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose There were many discussions in past few days and I'm not delighted to have another one, but the right side here is really blurry, so let's hear what others have to say. --Екатерина Борисова 02:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Looks a bit grainy, especially on the right. I would have expected a bit more detail and sharpness for such an open daytime image.--Peulle 07:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per others; quality of the right part is not adequate for the situation and camera. --Plozessor 10:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Ford_Mustang_Dark_Horse_Rutesheimer_Autoschau_2025_DSC_9225.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ford Mustang Dark Horse at Rutesheimer Autoschau 2025 --Alexander-93 18:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Cluttered background --Jakubhal 08:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
File:20221018_Ulmer_Tor_Memmingen.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View along the Ulmer Straße to the Ulmer Tor in Memmingen --FlocciNivis 08:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
--Sebring12Hrs 13:35, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Oppose Facades are too dark.
Comment I tried to fix that. Is this okay now? --FlocciNivis 17:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes
Support ! --Sebring12Hrs 22:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs, discussion has not be resolved here --Jakubhal 08:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose No good lighting -- Spurzem 12:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok for me. The actual subject - the gate - is properly lit; the dark shadows and strong contrasts are causing an interesting (for me, appealing) look. --Plozessor 10:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Plozessor. However, the dark areas could be brightened up a little with curves. --Smial 11:48, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Every day, I'm more and more amazed at what is being rated as a quality image here. Conversely, I'm also surprised at the good photos that are being downgraded. -- Spurzem 09:47, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I have the same feeling but I don't refer to the same pictures. Here FlocciNivis increased brightness. --Sebring12Hrs 10:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
File:20220702_Aphantopus_hyperantus_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Ringlet in the bird sanctuary Ismaninger Speichersee und Fischteiche --FlocciNivis 08:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose lack of sharpness --A S M Jobaer 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak support My issue here is overexposure of a flower, however there is no issue with sharpness here and I think it's still worth discussion --Jakubhal 08:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose since the flower (that the ringlet sits on) is completely blown out. Sharpness is very good though. --Plozessor 10:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment I tried to fix that now. Thank you for the feedback --FlocciNivis 17:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Anti-skate_device_shaped_like_maple_leaf,_Windsor,_Ontario,_2025-05-30.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Anti-skate device shaped like maple leaf, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-30I --Crisco 1492 01:18, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose The bottom is blurred in the concrete, otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 02:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Deliberate, as it shows the edge dropping away --Crisco 1492 11:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Opening discussion as issue has not been resolved --Jakubhal 08:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Just dropping link to general overview of object: File:Anti-skate devices shaped like maple leaf, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-05-31.jpg Crisco 1492 16:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The subject seems well captured. DoF not high enough to capture the concrete further away, but I don't think it's needed in this case. Cropping the bottom (and corresponding top, for balance) may be advised.--Peulle 07:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Uva_nera_da_vino_-_grappoli_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Black wine grapes – bunch -- -Anna.Massini 20:30, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini -Anna.Massini 20:30, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Good quality but need more categories --A S M Jobaer 06:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Another random review. I have an issue with sharpness, but I think it is good enough. No issue with categories here --Jakubhal 08:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per Jakubhal. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I am not rating a list of categories here, but a photo. -- Spurzem 12:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Jakubhal. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Quality/detail/noise/DoF not adequate for a picture in bright daylight. Categorization and description is very good. --Plozessor 10:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Yes those Samsung Galaxy A series hasn't really good cameras, and I don't think if it is really possible to take a better picture with this camera. --Sebring12Hrs 12:04, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- F. Riedelio 13:27, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:BeMoon,_Cyclingworld_Europe_2024,_Meerbusch_(P1170982-RR).jpg
[edit]- Nomination BeMoon gravel bikes at Cyclingworld Europe 2024 in Meerbusch --MB-one 06:36, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Cluttered scene with bikes merging with the background --Jakubhal 05:26, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, that it's a busy scene. But the main subjects are IMO clearly distinguishable. --MB-one 16:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Berlin_-_Landwirtschaftliche_Hochschule_6691.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Heinrich Ferdinand Eckert bust in the Landwirtschaftliche Hochschule Berlin, Germany. --Phyrexian 20:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose The head is not really sharp --Jakubhal 08:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunately not sharp. -- Екатерина Борисова 02:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Berlin_-_Landwirtschaftliche_Hochschule_6688.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Albrecht Daniel Thaer bust in the Landwirtschaftliche Hochschule Berlin, Germany. --Phyrexian 20:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Some noise and not very sharp. Let's discuss to confirm if it is QI --Jakubhal 08:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Slightly blurry and with a lot of chroma noise. Also inadequate file name. --Plozessor 10:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Open_wing_dorsal_basking_activity_of_Celaenorrhinus_patula_de_Nicéville,_1889_-_Large_Spotted_Flat_WLB_DSC_9399.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Open wing dorsal basking activity of Celaenorrhinus patula --Rijuroy89 16:07, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- I don't want to reject it and I'm fine with it being accepted as is, but I think it is a little bit noisy and not exactly in the focus. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lvova --Jakubhal 15:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It lacks sharpness. --Sebring12Hrs 09:38, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Plozessor 10:45, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:2014-2022_Subaru_Sambar_Truck_Grand_Cab_rear (bearb Sp).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Rear view of 2014 Subaru Sambar Truck Grand Cab --TTTNIS 13:43, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Blends with the car in the background --Jakubhal 08:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Yes, that is an unfortunate background object.--Peulle 07:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Oppose
- Please look to the new version. I think it is one of the better photos of cars we have here though I miss the license plate. Best regards -- Spurzem 12:37, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support OK now.--Peulle 06:48, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support New version is OK. -- Екатерина Борисова 16:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Lar_National_Park_by_HADI_12.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lar National Park, WLE Iran, HADI --Lvova 00:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice picture and QI IMO, but 3000x2000 pixels: Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. --Lmbuga 00:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't get your opinion. It is higher than needed for QI, where is the problem? --Lvova 00:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Commons:Image guidelines If you decide to submit the image at its maximum size, be sure to erase the spot (or bird) in the top center. --Lmbuga 00:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Commons:Image guidelines: "Images should not be downsampled" --Lmbuga 01:01, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
If you say the image hasn't been resized, I'd believe it, but not to that exact size when there are two other images with the same size. --Lmbuga 01:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not an author, so I will not submit a larger file and have no guesses how big it was, but you didn't persuade me that this >than 2mp file lost a lot of needed information (as it is mentioned as a reason in the rules). It is a good picture, no need to compare it with a some picture that could be maybe somewhere --Lvova 03:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Seriously, you vote on your own nominations ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not an author, so I will not submit a larger file and have no guesses how big it was, but you didn't persuade me that this >than 2mp file lost a lot of needed information (as it is mentioned as a reason in the rules). It is a good picture, no need to compare it with a some picture that could be maybe somewhere --Lvova 03:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Commons:Image guidelines If you decide to submit the image at its maximum size, be sure to erase the spot (or bird) in the top center. --Lmbuga 00:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't get your opinion. It is higher than needed for QI, where is the problem? --Lvova 00:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose for now. I added the implicit supporting vote by Lvova. There are lots of photos with 3000x2000 pixels in Category:Lar National Park. The camera has four times this resolution. May be the author downsized the photos or possibly took them intentionally at lower resolution. However, there is no description, only a very general category for an area of 35,765 ha and no name for the umbelliferous plant with yellow flowers or for the peak. This is insufficient IMO. Even the file name should be improved. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- @HADI: may be you can fit it? :) @Darafsh: or probably you know who can help. Lvova 12:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Info Sorry, there is a description, but it just says "Lar National Park, province of Teheran" in Farsi language. I overlooked this, but there is still insufficient information. BTW, pings do not work here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment The nominator can't vote. --Sebring12Hrs 12:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Before making accusations, at least try to look at the edit history. My vote was not registered as a "support" vote by me, so I should not have to listen "seriously" and get my reply crossed out because of double inattention. Lvova 13:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment I am very sorry. This was my mistake. I am going to check the other images whether they were also nominated by you. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry Lvova !!! --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks both of you, I'm glad that we resolved this quickly :) Lvova 13:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry Lvova !!! --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- @HADI: may be you can fit it? :) @Darafsh: or probably you know who can help. Lvova 12:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose All these images are taken with a Nikon D5300, offering a resolution of 6.000 x 4.000 Pixel. HADI's images habe always only 3.000 x 2.000 Pixel. So it seems that he downscale them sytematicaly. The minimum resolution of 2 MB is not the point here. The Commons:Image guidelines say also "Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. Downsampling reduces the amount of information stored in the image file..." So these downscaled images don't meet the guidline. --Milseburg 13:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I read it as a recommendation for beginners, like how-to: if your photo is not ideal, take it easy and upload without downscaling for the quality, it has value because it is a part of free knowledge, more information is better. But to read it as a prohibition and 'you have not to downscale' (if it is downscaling, not 'to print from raw in such resolution')... I'm sure that the rules are not about it because I think all of you regularly use crop, and it is also a way to lose an information for quality. I see in this an amazing desire for lack of freedom, but I can do nothing with it, just to show my astonishment. Lvova 13:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Apart from the downscaling issue there's also the insict above the mountain. Also lack of description (this is a specific mountain that should be mentioend.) --Plozessor 03:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Dashti_(Jashak)_Salt_Dome_by_HADI_16.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Jashak salt dome, WLE Iran, HADI --Lvova 00:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Same size as others: Nice picture and QI IMO, but 3000x2000 pixels: Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. --Lmbuga 01:09, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
The same argument against as a little bit higher - the same disagreement. "Nice picture and QI", much more than needed, no need to compare with unexistent possibilities. --Lvova 03:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Vote stroken. The nominator has no vote. --Milseburg 12:48, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Support
- Why do you stroke instead of take a look into history and find there something? Crazyness. Lvova 13:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC) The voting-icon was mistakenly added and counted by Robert.--Milseburg 13:09, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment I am sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Why do you stroke instead of take a look into history and find there something? Crazyness. Lvova 13:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC) The voting-icon was mistakenly added and counted by Robert.--Milseburg 13:09, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Downsizing is a well-known bad practice, but some images are also cropped. In some cases, downsizing might be acceptable, such as when the image is a composition made from other images—but this is not one of those cases --Wilfredor 21:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Appears downsized. Could be eligible for support if a larger resolution version is uploaded.--Peulle 06:45, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Lar_National_Park_by_HADI_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lar National Park, WLE Iran, HADI --Lvova 00:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice picture and QI IMO, but 3000x2000 pixels: Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. --Lmbuga 01:08, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
The same argument against as a little bit higher - the same disagreement. "Nice picture and QI", much more than needed, no need to compare with unexistent possibilities. --Lvova 03:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC) Oppose Still a bit too blurry IMO. In addition, categorization, description, and even the file name are too generic, especially because the coordinates of the location were not provided either. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Robert, please, be more careful, do not decorate "support" in a situation where the rejection is disputed by the nominator. People are inattentive and rude, and as a result they suspect me of breaking the rules. Lvova 13:08, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- I am very sorry. You are right --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Robert, please, be more careful, do not decorate "support" in a situation where the rejection is disputed by the nominator. People are inattentive and rude, and as a result they suspect me of breaking the rules. Lvova 13:08, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

File:พระธาตุดอยจอมทอง_Phra_Dhatu_Doi_Chom_Thong_2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Phra That Doi Chom Thong, Thailand --Chainwit. 16:43, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 17:50, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Level of detail is too low for a well-lit exterior picture, sorry. PC would have needed, as well as treating the burnt highlights --Benjism89 17:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Weak
Support The chosen wide-angle perspective looks a little unfortunate, but I don't really see any reason to correct the perspective. The overexposed reflections only affect a very small part of the object and I don't find that very disturbing in this case, because overall the shiny surfaces don't look wrong. --Smial 13:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Otranto_-_Coastal_landscape_-_07.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Otranto (Apulia, Italy) - Coastal landscape East of town --Benjism89 10:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose Very over-processed picture appearance --Lmbuga 15:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Colors and contrast are very good. The image is sharp in the foreground. May be a bit unsharp on the left trees in the background. But let's see what others think. --Sebring12Hrs 16:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The colours may be a little too saturated, but the image sharpness is good enough considering the high resolution. The lighting almost directly from behind is not so nice because it looks similar to a flash and therefore appears ‘flat’. --Smial 23:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support As someone who lived very close to the sea for many years in the Caribbean, I can say that nature and the ocean there look different. Because of the sunlight, the colors of things appear saturated, even though they’re not --Wilfredor 21:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Trail_Vodno.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Trail in Vodno, Skopje. --Kallerna 05:29, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Sorry but nothing interesting --A S M Jobaer 11:15, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting or not, good enough quality for QI --Jakubhal 12:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment @A S M Jobaer: The fact that you find this picture uninteresting is irrelevant here. What could be relevant is if the picture was out of Commons' project scope, i.e. "providing knowledge; instructional or informative" (I don't believe it's the case here). --Benjism89 18:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC))
Support Good to me. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support solid good quality --Kritzolina 05:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Berlin_-_Museum_für_Naturkunde_6942.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Specimen of conjoined twins mutation in the Natural History Museum, Berlin, Germany. --Phyrexian 23:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Very nice. I'd crop a bit off the bottom to keep the ends equidistant. --Crisco 1492 00:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
@Crisco 1492:Done. --Phyrexian 06:08, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 16:14, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The lighting is bad. Also, the photo could be sharper. In my opinion, it's not a high-quality image. -- Spurzem 10:44, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose because of the overexposed areas. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok to me and hight EV --Wilfredor 21:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose lack of sharpness, so not a QI. And: why nominate something that fails our COM:FN guideline, as the chosen name is too broad? I'm not going to fix it, though, until the voting is over. Grand-Duc 21:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Hotel_Mercure,_Middle_Road,_Singapur,_2023-08-16,_DD_04.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mercure Hotel, Middle Road, Singapore --Poco a poco 08:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:16, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ziv 14:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
-- Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Oppose Too distorted, one cannot see here the real shape of the building
New version Poco a poco 07:09, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment New version is not perfect, but acceptable IMO, so I removed my opposing vote. -- Екатерина Борисова 12:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too distorted --Lmbuga 16:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I think distortion is acceptable in the new version. --Benjism89 18:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Place_des_Arcades_in_Sauveterre-de-R_03.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-Rouergue, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 09:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- Here the perspective correction has led to the fact that the middle of the image falls back, and the left side of the building looks noticeably higher than the right. --Екатерина Борисова 02:24, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't see the "middle of the image fallas back" or the left building higher than the right buildings. --Sebring12Hrs 11:14, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not the left building is higher than the right buildings, but one side of the left building is higher than another. --Lvova 17:23, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
New version uploaded. --Tournasol7 06:51, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark, and white balance off. (Both is not natural as the picture was taken shortly after noon in May.) Perspective is harder to fix, and indeed it looks a bit weird because on both edges the buildings are higher than in the corner (which is in the middle). Here is a suggestion: https://ibb.co/Z12DQqkY. --Plozessor 11:24, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Your version looks fine! -- Екатерина Борисова 20:32, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- I like it also, not only because of colors, but because of the left side of the left building, the tower and the right part of the right building. Lvova 14:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Can't see anything wrong with PC here, it looks natural when the buildings are small and the photographer far from them. WB seems fine to me . But yes, as in many of your pictures Krzysztof, it looks like a storm will start in five minutes : increase exposure ! :) --Benjism89 18:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's of course a dull light day. The colors on the Plozessor image isn't a bit too much warm ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Even in my version, the church clock, the license plate of the grey car, and the sign above that care are still (very slightly) blue, so probably it should be evern warmer. (In the original version they are #b3c1ca, #c5cdd9, #96a0a1, all blue tones.) --Plozessor 18:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Mausoleum_of_António_Gomes_Leal,_by_Francisco_dos_Santos,_Alto_de_São_João_cemetery,_Lisbon,_Portugal_(PPL1-Corrected)_julesvernex2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mausoleum of António Gomes Leal, by Francisco dos Santos, Alto de São João cemetery, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 21:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
- The statue looks good, but the background is very overexposed. --Екатерина Борисова 03:21, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment The background is indeed bright, but not overexposed: there are no clipped highlights, neither in the original Raw file nor in the edited JPEG --Julesvernex2 08:35, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose There are lighting conditions that make a good photo impossible. Here, the shadows are too dark, and the background is grossly overexposed in places. In my opinion, this photo is by no means a quality image. -- Spurzem 10:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Difficult light conditions with the sunlit background indeed, but IMO the photographer handled them very well. Some elements in the background are very bright but IMO not clipped. The actual subject is properly exposed and razor-sharp. --Plozessor 11:28, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
SupportI agree with Plozessor. --Romzig 17:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment This reminds me of my attempt to photograph the black cat in the dark basement without any light. I definitely should have featured the picture here. ;-) Best regards -- Spurzem 06:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment I think the complaints about the bright background are absolutely fair, so I've uploaded a new version with slightly reduced highlights (although not so much as to give the image that awful low-contrast HDR-look). A couple of points on where I personally stand on this image: i) Is the background overexposed? No. Overexposure is when parts of the image are captured as pure white (R:100%, G:100%, B:100%) because the full well capacity of some pixels was surpassed, leading to loss of information. That did not happen here; ii) Was this the best time to photograph the statue? No. A few minutes before the dappled light over the statue was probably stronger, reducing the contrast to the background. I'll have to ge there again :) --Julesvernex2 09:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment It is not true that photos are only overexposed if individual pixels have an RGB value of 0xFFFFFF. Individual color channels can also overflow, and this often leads to serious color distortions. I once uploaded an example a few years ago to illustrate the problem. Please take a look at the different file versions here: File:Unna ZIB RIMG10380.jpg --Smial 12:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- You're right, fair point: clipping on individual colour channels can also lead to information loss. That wasn't the case in this image, though. Your example is very interesting, thank you for uploading the individual channel clipping to the image's history. Out of curiosity, have you tried reprocessing this image with a recent demosaicing algorithm? In my experience (although it may not be applicable to an image with this amount of clipping), AI-based demosaicing algorithms (e.g., DXO, Adobe Enhance) are sometimes better at guessing the correct luminance value of overflown pixels from the values of the surrounding pixels --Julesvernex2 14:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment No, I have never used “AI” tools and probably never will, at least not knowingly (With phones, you no longer have any significant influence on what the built-in image degradation system puts together). The exception is neat image, which I have been using for several years. --Smial 18:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- You're right, fair point: clipping on individual colour channels can also lead to information loss. That wasn't the case in this image, though. Your example is very interesting, thank you for uploading the individual channel clipping to the image's history. Out of curiosity, have you tried reprocessing this image with a recent demosaicing algorithm? In my experience (although it may not be applicable to an image with this amount of clipping), AI-based demosaicing algorithms (e.g., DXO, Adobe Enhance) are sometimes better at guessing the correct luminance value of overflown pixels from the values of the surrounding pixels --Julesvernex2 14:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Otranto_-_Cava_di_bauxite_-_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Otranto (Apulia, Italy) - Lake created by an abandoned bauxite mine --Benjism89 06:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Level of detail is not good --Poco a poco 15:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Maybe not perfect, but over the bar for me. --Plozessor 04:45, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Anna.Massini 20:09, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Anna.MassiniAnna.Massini 20:09, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Sharp enough for an A4-size print. Probably denoising somewhat overdone? --Smial 13:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Экспонаты_музея_Востока_на_ВДНХ_28.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A fragment of a Japanese lamp from the 18th century --Lvova 06:01, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:23, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Borderline bottom crop. Please discuss. --Sebring12Hrs 16:27, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Hochries,_Alpes_del_Chiemgau,_Alemania,_2024-10-18,_DD_17-22_PAN.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hochries, Chiemgau Alps, Germany --Poco a poco 16:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
- A colored edge can be seen on the ridge near the sun. The right frame is too blurred and the transition is too clear. The horizon should not be so curved although the earth is of course a sphere. --Ermell 08:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
New version, thanks --Poco a poco 20:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Overall blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 16:24, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- I sharpened it, QI IMHO, please, let's discuss. Btw the images has 32 Mpx of resolution --Poco a poco 12:53, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment I don't know if this are CAs or not but there are some strange textures at the top of the trees. I added a note. --Sebring12Hrs 15:20, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
That was a bit of chroma noise, removed. Poco a poco 16:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)It has some technical deficiencies (especially sharpness and detail), but the composition is very good and overall it is over the bar for me. It is a bit dark, but it was taken at evening so that seems realistic. --Plozessor 07:07, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Support
Comment Sharpness is good now but there are some stitching errors visible if you look at the horizont.--Ermell 10:59, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
--Plozessor 03:46, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Oppose Indeed, there are stitching errors, had overlooked these.
- Will need 2 days to fix them Poco a poco 06:17, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Plozessor, Ermell: I'm ready to fix any stitching issues, but I cannot say for sure that there are any. In some areas, they could be but I'm not 100% sure. Could you please add notes in the areas you believe rework is required? Poco a poco 02:12, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Marked an obvious one. --Plozessor 15:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you,
Done Poco a poco 08:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Now. --Plozessor 05:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you,
- Marked an obvious one. --Plozessor 15:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 8 after nomination)
[edit]- Thu 29 May → Fri 06 Jun
- Fri 30 May → Sat 07 Jun
- Sat 31 May → Sun 08 Jun
- Sun 01 Jun → Mon 09 Jun
- Mon 02 Jun → Tue 10 Jun
- Tue 03 Jun → Wed 11 Jun
- Wed 04 Jun → Thu 12 Jun
- Thu 05 Jun → Fri 13 Jun
- Fri 06 Jun → Sat 14 Jun