Jump to content

User talk:Bgag

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shirvanshahs Palace Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Palace of the Shirvanshahs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:04, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bay window in Baku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bay window in Baku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:00, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church gate in Georgia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthodox church near Nekresi monastery 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nekresi monastery 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nekresi monastery 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sioni Cathedral (Tbilisi) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Weak support, good exposure and resolution but slightly low level of details. --ArildV 17:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tbilisi Cable Car 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:06, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa dei Cervi (Herculaneum) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terme Centrali (Herculaneum) - Palaestra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle near Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:03, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Marcus Nonius Balbus (Herculanum) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Microtaxi in Procida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 08:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nekresi monastery 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nekresi monastery 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sign to Gremi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citadel of Gremi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thermopolium (VI. 19.) (Herculaneum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo d'Avalos (Procida) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:13, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houses in Corricella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna delle Grazie, Procida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 02:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Corricella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of the Clarisses, Santa Chiara (Naples) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of the Guardian, Sipán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Site of Túcume 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Lambayeque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Ramada Costa del Sol, Tumbes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Tumbes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street sign in Tumbes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of Lord of Sipán 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:40, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Túcume.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 05:50, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marina di Procida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:18, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain in Baku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:22, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nekresi monastery 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citadel of Gremi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citadel of Gremi 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Archangels (Gremi) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citadel of Gremi 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:01, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-footed boobies in flight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:11, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz giant tortoises 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph in Gala 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:53, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph in Gala 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph in Gala 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gobustan mud volcanoes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:53, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great frigatebird 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Livestock market, Otavalo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gala State Historical Ethnographic Reserve 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good picture but tilted (as can be seen from the sign and from the wall in the background), should be fixed. --Plozessor 03:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC) ✓ Done --Bgag 18:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:22, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freshwater Railway Station sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michaelmas Cay 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cairns (Queensland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freshwater Railway Station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Archangels (Gremi) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Kadellar 09:52, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gobustan mud volcanoes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:30, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gobustan mud volcanoes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:58, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cup mark, Gobustan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:08, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cup mark, Gobustan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyph in Gala 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:08, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brown booby, Michaelmas Cay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 06:26, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Saint George (Alaverdi) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support You was very bold taking pictures where it's strongly prohibited :) --Екатерина Борисова 03:12, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Info The advice is for the interior of the building. --Bgag 03:58, 19 May 2025
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:12, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michaelmas Cay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mossman Gorge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Australian brushturkey, Mossman Gorge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Darwin Convention Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:26, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Saint George (Alaverdi) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 06:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 09:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friday Mosque of Şamaxı.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:27, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 04:49, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friday Mosque of Şamaxı 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:27, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 03:46, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 04:49, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mossman Gorge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Mother of God (Ikalto) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of the Mother of God (Ikalto) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 04:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galápagos Lava Lizard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mellat Palace Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imamzadeh Saleh, Tehran 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Saint George (Alaverdi) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 17:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Transfiguration (Ikalto) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 06:21, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friday Mosque of Şamaxı 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friday Mosque of Şamaxı 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganjali Khan Complex, Kerman 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Academy of Ikalto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvevris in Ikalto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friday Mosque of Şamaxı 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:16, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gargoyle in Jerónimos Monastery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gargoyle in Jerónimos Monastery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker in Coimbra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manhole cover in Coimbra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rua Augusta Arch (Lisbon) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:46, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Transfiguration (Ikalto) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 08:22, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Buildings in Astana 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: focusing on the building (no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Menakei.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mellat Palace Museum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganjali Khan Bathhouse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of Silence, Yazd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:23, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramparts of Sighnaghi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Sighnaghi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 02:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Saint George (Sighnaghi) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 02:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colourful car in Sighnaghi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fingerposts in Sighnaghi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganjali Khan Complex, Kerman 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and natural. --Lvova 19:48, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabo da Roca Lighthouse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:47, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabo da Roca Lighthouse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabo da Roca Lighthouse 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 03:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dried fish in Praia da Nazaré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanctuary of Our Lady of Nazaré 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:48, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaverdi Monastery 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of Silence - East, Yazd 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gonbad-e Ali 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gonbad-e Ali 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golshan Caravanserai, Kerman 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:04, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:03, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Lahic 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of Silence - East, Yazd 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Academy of Ikalto 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 14:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeddi Gumbaz Mausoleum 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:50, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 07:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colourful car in Sighnaghi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodbe Monastery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Private Palace, Pasargadae - Columns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]